Proton GEN-2 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.8% pass rate
from 223 tests in 2017
(28% worse than other 2010 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton GEN-2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Position lamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Rear lamps (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Front lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Battery (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.90% fail on Horn
    • 0.45% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.45% fail on Lamp
  • 14% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Parking brake performance (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Rear wheels (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.45% fail on Front wheels
    • 3.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Components
        • 0.90% fail on Hoses (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.45% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal
        • 0.45% fail on Anti-slip
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 7.6% fail on Tread depth (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
  • 7.6% fail on Suspension
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.90% fail on Attachment (92 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Linkage condition (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.90% fail on Rear (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Front
    • 0.90% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.90% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.90% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.90% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.45% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
  • 7.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.90% fail on Washers
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.45% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.45% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.90% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.45% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on System
  • 0.90% fail on Steering
    • 0.45% fail on Steering system
      • 0.45% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.45% fail on Power steering
      • 0.45% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.45% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.45% fail on Doors
      • 0.45% fail on Passengers other
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages