Proton GEN-2 MOT Results
Registered in 200963.4% pass rate
from 254 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton GEN-2 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
7.5% fail on
Position lamps
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Front lamps
- 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.1% fail on Horn (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 2.4% fail on Battery (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.39% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.39% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.39% fail on
Flashing type
-
7.5% fail on
Position lamps
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rear wheels (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front wheels
- 0.39% fail on Parking brake operation
- 0.39% fail on Brake imbalance
-
4.7% fail on
Hub components
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 2.0% fail on Brake calipers (31 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
3.5% fail on
Parking brake
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Components
- 1.2% fail on Pipes
- 0.39% fail on Cylinders
- 0.39% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.2% fail on Leaks (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Operation (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Components
-
0.79% fail on
Mechanical components
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Cable (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on ABS
- 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Tyres
- 4.7% fail on Condition
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth
-
7.9% fail on
Suspension
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
2.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.79% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.39% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.39% fail on Linkage condition
-
1.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
(67 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Component mounting (82 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.79% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.79% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
7.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.9% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 1.2% fail on Washers
- 0.79% fail on Mirrors
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Cap (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Emissions
- 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
-
0.79% fail on
Steering system
- 0.79% fail on Steering rack
-
0.79% fail on
Power steering
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Operation
- 0.39% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.79% fail on
Steering system
-
0.79% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.39% fail on
Doors
- 0.39% fail on Drivers
-
0.39% fail on
Load security
- 0.39% fail on Bootlid
-
0.39% fail on
Doors
-
0.39% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.39% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.39% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.39% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Proton GEN-2 (2004 - 2016)
Decent ride and handling. Tidy styling. Keen pricing.