Proton GEN-2 MOT Results
Registered in 200948.4% pass rate
from 153 tests in 2021
(34% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton GEN-2 is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Brakes
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Rbt
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Parking brake performance (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
8.5% fail on
Rbt
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt
- 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt
- 0.65% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.65% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.3% fail on Brake pads
-
2.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.0% fail on Brake discs
-
1.3% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Cable
- 0.65% fail on Lever
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
4.6% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Hand lever (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Pedal
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake control
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Brake fluid (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(61% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp levelling device (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Horn (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.65% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.65% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.65% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.65% fail on Position lamp
-
0.65% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.65% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.65% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
8.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
7.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.65% fail on Ball joint
- 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint
- 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
7.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Transmission
-
2.6% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.6% fail on Joints
-
2.6% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.6% fail on
Doors
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Driver's door
(16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Door condition (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Other passenger's door
(11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.65% fail on Door condition
-
1.3% fail on
Driver's door
(16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Tank
- 0.65% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.65% fail on
Chassis
- 0.65% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.65% fail on Bumpers
-
0.65% fail on
Body
- 0.65% fail on Other body component
-
0.65% fail on
Load security
-
0.65% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.65% fail on Other tailgate component
-
0.65% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.65% fail on
Seats
- 0.65% fail on Passenger's seat
-
2.6% fail on
Transmission
-
9.2% fail on
Visibility
- 5.2% fail on Wipers
-
2.6% fail on
View to rear
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Mirrors (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Washers
-
8.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.65% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.65% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
7.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
7.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.2% fail on
Tyres
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.65% fail on Size/type
-
4.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
0.65% fail on
Airbags
- 0.65% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.3% fail on
Steering
-
0.65% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.65% fail on Track rod end
-
0.65% fail on
Power steering
- 0.65% fail on Other components
-
0.65% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.65% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.65% fail on Registration plates
-
0.65% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.65% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Proton GEN-2 (2004 - 2016)
Decent ride and handling. Tidy styling. Keen pricing.