Proton GEN-2 MOT Results
Registered in 200450.0% pass rate
from 70 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton GEN-2 is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
11% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Individual lamps (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.9% fail on All direction indicators (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.4% fail on All position lamps
- 1.4% fail on Front lamps
-
4.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Tell tale
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp
- 1.4% fail on Switch
-
11% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
24% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 7.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.9% fail on Front wheels
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
8.6% fail on
Hub components
- 5.7% fail on Brake calipers (29 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Brake discs
-
4.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.9% fail on
Components
- 1.4% fail on Pipes
- 1.4% fail on Hoses
- 1.4% fail on Leaks
-
2.9% fail on
Components
-
2.9% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(75 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Components
- 1.4% fail on Servos
- 1.4% fail on Leaks
-
1.4% fail on
Components
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
- 1.4% fail on Anti-slip
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 4.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 4.3% fail on Linkage condition (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
8.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Spring mounting (35 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Front
- 1.4% fail on Rear
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
- 5.7% fail on Condition
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
-
5.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.7% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.7% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
2.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
(9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Chassis (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Doors
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Passengers front (20 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Body security
- 1.4% fail on Body condition
-
2.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
(9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 1.4% fail on Washers
- 1.4% fail on Mirrors
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on System
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.9% fail on
Power steering
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 1.4% fail on Other components
-
2.9% fail on
Power steering
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Proton GEN-2 (2004 - 2016)
Decent ride and handling. Tidy styling. Keen pricing.