Proton GEN-2 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
50.0% pass rate
from 70 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton GEN-2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 11% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Individual lamps (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on All direction indicators (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.4% fail on All position lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Front lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.4% fail on Switch
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 7.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
    • 8.6% fail on Hub components
      • 5.7% fail on Brake calipers (29 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.9% fail on Components
        • 1.4% fail on Pipes
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
      • 1.4% fail on Leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Air and vacuum systems (75 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Components
        • 1.4% fail on Servos
      • 1.4% fail on Leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal
        • 1.4% fail on Anti-slip
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 4.3% fail on Linkage condition (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 8.6% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Spring mounting (35 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
      • 1.4% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.7% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.9% fail on Vehicle structure (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Passengers front (20 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Body security
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition
  • 5.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on System
  • 2.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Power steering (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 1.4% fail on Other components
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages