MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Porsche » Cayenne » 2010

Porsche Cayenne MOT Results

Registered in 2010
79.8% pass rate
from 984 tests in 2021
(44% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Porsche Cayenne is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.30% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.10% fail on Horn
  • 4.9% fail on Suspension (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Springs (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Coil springs (42% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Coil spring (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.10% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.10% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.10% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 3.3% fail on Visibility (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.10% fail on View to rear
      • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.7% fail on Brakes (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.91% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.41% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.91% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake linings and pads (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Brake pads (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Brake performance (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (90% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.41% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.41% fail on Electronic parking brake (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal
    • 0.10% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 1.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.81% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.81% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Other passenger's door (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust system (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.10% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.10% fail on Transmission
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Panel
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's seat
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.71% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.61% fail on Attachment
    • 0.41% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages