Porsche Cayenne MOT Results

Registered in 2010
81.5% pass rate
from 1,011 tests in 2020
(46% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Porsche Cayenne is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.099% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.40% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.1% fail on Visibility (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.099% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.099% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.40% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.59% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.59% fail on Electronic parking brake (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Brake performance (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt
          • 0.099% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.099% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.099% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.099% fail on Rbt
          • 0.099% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.099% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.20% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.20% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.099% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.099% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.099% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 2.6% fail on Suspension (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Springs (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Coil springs (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Suspension arms (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.099% fail on Linkage
    • 0.099% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.099% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.69% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.69% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.099% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.099% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.79% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 0.79% fail on Body, chassis, structure (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Transmission
      • 0.40% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Joints
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
    • 0.099% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.099% fail on Body
      • 0.099% fail on Other body component
    • 0.099% fail on Seats
      • 0.099% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.69% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.69% fail on Attachment
  • 0.49% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Other components (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages