Perodua Kenari MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.6% pass rate
from 76 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Perodua Kenari is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.3% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.3% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.3% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 9.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Springs
      • 2.6% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (101 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 3.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
  • 2.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages