MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Perodua » Kelisa » 2006

Perodua Kelisa MOT Results

Registered in 2006
71.5% pass rate
from 144 tests in 2017
(32% better than other 2006 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Perodua Kelisa is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (46% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.69% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Battery
    • 0.69% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 7.6% fail on Brakes
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Rear wheels
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.4% fail on Components
        • 1.4% fail on Pipes
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Size/type
  • 7.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
  • 5.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.2% fail on Emissions
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.9% fail on Suspension (71% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.69% fail on Front
      • 0.69% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.69% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.69% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.69% fail on Attachment
    • 0.69% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.69% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.69% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 3.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.69% fail on Chassis
    • 0.69% fail on Seats
      • 0.69% fail on Drivers
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 0.69% fail on Operation
      • 0.69% fail on Drive system
    • 0.69% fail on Steering system
      • 0.69% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.69% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.69% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.69% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.69% fail on Vehicle Identification Number

Search Good Garages