Perodua Kelisa MOT Results

Registered in 2003
55.9% pass rate
from 93 tests in 2020
(2.5% better than other 2003 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Perodua Kelisa is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (2.8% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Stop lamp (50% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (60% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (19% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 17% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
  • 14% fail on Suspension (17% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers (64% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 11% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (11% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance (44% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (30% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (33% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (33% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
  • 8.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility (19% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (1.9% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on View to rear (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Mirrors (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres (4.2% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth (31% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint

Search Good Garages