Nissan X-Trail MOT Results

Registered in 2010
70.9% pass rate
from 1,338 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan X-Trail is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.52% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.52% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.37% fail on Front
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.075% fail on Location
    • 0.075% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.075% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.075% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.075% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.075% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.075% fail on Condition
  • 9.9% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Position lamps (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Front lamps (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.075% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Headlamps (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.22% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.37% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Stop lamp (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Horn
    • 0.075% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Hub components (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake pads (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.82% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake operation (44 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.82% fail on Components
        • 0.67% fail on Pipes
        • 0.22% fail on Hoses
      • 0.22% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.075% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.075% fail on Pedal
        • 0.075% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.075% fail on ABS
    • 0.075% fail on Restricted movement
  • 5.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.075% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering system
      • 0.90% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.82% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.52% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.52% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.22% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.075% fail on Body security
  • 0.22% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.075% fail on Tank
  • 0.22% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.075% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.075% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages