Nissan X-Trail MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.1% pass rate
from 1,554 tests in 2020
(15% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan X-Trail is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 16% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 13% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Suspension arm (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 9.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.90% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.90% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Springs
      • 0.064% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.064% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.064% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.7% fail on Brakes (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.32% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.064% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.064% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.064% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.90% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.064% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake control (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.064% fail on Pedal
    • 0.19% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 9.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.97% fail on Electrical equipment (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Horn (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Trailer electrical socket (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.064% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.77% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.064% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.064% fail on Side repeaters
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.19% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.19% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.19% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.064% fail on Tank
      • 0.064% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.064% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.064% fail on Bracket
    • 0.064% fail on Body
      • 0.064% fail on Panel
    • 0.064% fail on Doors
      • 0.064% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.064% fail on Door condition
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Steering linkage components (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.58% fail on Spark ignition (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.064% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.064% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.77% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.64% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 0.51% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.51% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.45% fail on Attachment
    • 0.064% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages