Nissan X-Trail MOT Results

Registered in 2009
65.6% pass rate
from 2,039 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan X-Trail is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 7.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage condition (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Front suspension joints (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.34% fail on Front
      • 0.049% fail on Rear
    • 0.29% fail on Drive shafts (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Front drive shafts (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Constant velocity joints (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Location
      • 0.098% fail on Condition (98% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.049% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.049% fail on Component mounting
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (18% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Rear lamps (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.64% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.59% fail on Stop lamp (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Battery
    • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Individual lamps (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Horn
    • 0.049% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 8.6% fail on Brakes (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Hub components (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.098% fail on Brake linings (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.098% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.098% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.049% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Components (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pipes (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Hoses
      • 0.049% fail on Leaks
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.049% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Valve stem (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.098% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering system
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.69% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.54% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.54% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.49% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Drivers
    • 0.15% fail on Body condition
    • 0.049% fail on Body security
  • 0.49% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (75% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on System
    • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.049% fail on Emissions
  • 0.29% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages