MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » X-Trail » 2005

Nissan X-Trail MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.3% pass rate
from 8,732 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan X-Trail is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 6.6% fail on Suspension arms (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (31% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts (35% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Front drive shafts (36% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (36% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Couplings
      • 0.069% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.069% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.77% fail on Front
      • 0.60% fail on Rear (35% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Location
    • 0.72% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.58% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.080% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.069% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.21% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.034% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.080% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.034% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.023% fail on Trailing arms (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Condition
    • 0.011% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.011% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (23% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.5% fail on Front lamps (31% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Rear lamps (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (48% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.023% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.011% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Battery (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.26% fail on Direction indicators (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Flashing type (91% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Individual lamps (92% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.080% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on All direction indicators (89% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.069% fail on Lamp
      • 0.069% fail on Switch
      • 0.023% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.069% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.069% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.023% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.023% fail on Horn (95% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 15% fail on Brakes (11% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Brake performance (20% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Front wheels (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.25% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.092% fail on Gradient hand brake (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 5.0% fail on Hub components (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.26% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.080% fail on Brake back plates (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Brake linings
    • 3.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.3% fail on Components
        • 2.9% fail on Pipes
        • 0.42% fail on Hoses (46% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.23% fail on Leaks
      • 0.080% fail on Operation
      • 0.057% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.72% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
    • 0.71% fail on Restricted movement (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on ABS (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.069% fail on Pedal
        • 0.034% fail on Condition
        • 0.034% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.011% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.011% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage
    • 0.011% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.011% fail on Components
        • 0.011% fail on Pipes
    • 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.011% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 9.8% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Steering system (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.092% fail on Steering rack (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.034% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.011% fail on Free play
        • 0.011% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.011% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.034% fail on Other components
      • 0.023% fail on Drive system
      • 0.011% fail on Rams
    • 0.10% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (12% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (22% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Bonnet (66% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 6.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (15% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Emissions (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Fuel system (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on System (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Tank
      • 0.011% fail on Cap
    • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested (44% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Size/type (92% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.92% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Body condition
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.011% fail on Drivers
    • 0.092% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.092% fail on Chassis
    • 0.069% fail on Body security
    • 0.046% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.034% fail on Load security
      • 0.023% fail on Access panel
      • 0.011% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.011% fail on Seats
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers
  • 0.82% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Seat belts (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Requirements
    • 0.21% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.45% fail on Registration plates and VIN (43% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plate (43% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels (44% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
  • 0.011% fail on Towbars
    • 0.011% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages