Nissan X-Trail MOT Results
Registered in 200350.2% pass rate
from 2,653 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan X-Trail is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(47% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(87% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover (62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
8.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(71% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Linkage (90% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (83% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 6.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Springs
-
3.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.9% fail on Coil spring (26% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Mounting (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.0% fail on
Sub-frames
(81% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Sub-frame (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint
- 0.90% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.68% fail on
Macpherson strut
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint
-
0.64% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.15% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.075% fail on Ball joint
- 0.038% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.075% fail on
Axles
- 0.075% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.038% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.038% fail on Other components
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(87% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
(14% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Brake performance
(24% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(66% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (72% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.49% fail on
Decelerometer
(14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.038% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.038% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.8% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.15% fail on
Decelerometer
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Parking brake performance (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.075% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.94% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(44% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(59% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance (50% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(59% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Brake performance not tested (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(66% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(84% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Brake linings
-
2.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(98% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Brake discs (91% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.038% fail on Cable
-
3.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.038% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.038% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.60% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.45% fail on Hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Pedal
-
0.60% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.60% fail on Lever
- 0.49% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.11% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.075% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.038% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.038% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.038% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.038% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.038% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.038% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
9.6% fail on
Brake performance
(24% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(63% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (97% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Transmission
(88% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(85% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Joints (87% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.038% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.38% fail on
Prop shafts
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Prop shaft (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Joints
- 0.038% fail on Bearing housing
- 0.038% fail on Belts
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(85% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(98% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (99% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.038% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.038% fail on Strengthening plate
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
(88% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Front passenger's door
(200% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Door condition (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Catch
-
0.53% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.45% fail on Door condition
- 0.075% fail on Catch (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.57% fail on
Front passenger's door
(200% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Chassis
- 0.83% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.34% fail on
Body
- 0.15% fail on Other body component
- 0.11% fail on Panel
- 0.075% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.075% fail on Tank
- 0.038% fail on Pipe
- 0.15% fail on Bumpers
-
0.075% fail on
Towbar
- 0.075% fail on Other towbar components (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Floor
-
0.075% fail on
Seats
- 0.075% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.075% fail on
Cabs
- 0.075% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.038% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.038% fail on Bracket
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(27% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device (78% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (36% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(34% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.98% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.72% fail on Battery(ies) (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Horn (79% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.45% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(67% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(67% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(67% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Direction indicators
(92% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Flashing type
(92% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Individual direction indicators (93% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Side repeaters (91% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Flashing type
(92% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.075% fail on Position lamp
-
0.038% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.038% fail on Switch
- 0.038% fail on Rear reflectors
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamps
-
9.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(24% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(28% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.15% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.15% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.038% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.038% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(28% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.72% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.075% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
8.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
-
0.23% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.23% fail on Windscreen
-
0.19% fail on
View to rear
- 0.19% fail on Mirrors
- 0.075% fail on Bonnet
-
7.8% fail on
Steering
(75% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Drag link end
-
0.075% fail on
Other components
- 0.038% fail on Steering component
- 0.038% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.41% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.41% fail on Steering rack
-
0.19% fail on
Power steering
- 0.11% fail on Other components
- 0.075% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.038% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.038% fail on Steering column
-
0.038% fail on
Steering play
- 0.038% fail on Steering rack
-
7.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
(26% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 0.075% fail on Size/type
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
(45% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (61% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Requirements
- 0.60% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (56% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Airbags
- 0.075% fail on Drivers airbag
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
(45% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.79% fail on Registration plates
- 0.038% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.64% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.57% fail on Attachment
- 0.075% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan X-Trail (2001 - 2007)
Excellent, honest vehicle, decent to drive on road and best in class off road. Better than original Freelander.