Nissan Tiida MOT Results
Registered in 201053.5% pass rate
from 254 tests in 2021
(33% worse than other 2010 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Tiida is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Suspension
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 11% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
11% fail on
Springs
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 11% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.79% fail on Ball joint
- 0.39% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
2.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings
-
16% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
10% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.39% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.39% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
0.39% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
10% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
3.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Hand lever (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.2% fail on Lever
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.39% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.39% fail on Brake fluid
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.79% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.79% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.39% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.39% fail on Position lamp
-
0.39% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.39% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.39% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.39% fail on Battery(ies)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
-
8.3% fail on
Visibility
- 6.7% fail on Wipers (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Washers
-
7.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.39% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
6.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.39% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.39% fail on Tank
-
4.3% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.39% fail on Condition
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.79% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.39% fail on Attachment