MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Tiida » 2010

Nissan Tiida MOT Results

Registered in 2010
53.5% pass rate
from 254 tests in 2021
(33% worse than other 2010 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Tiida is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 16% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 11% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 11% fail on Springs (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 2.4% fail on Sub-frames (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 21% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.39% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.39% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.39% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Hand lever (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid
  • 9.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.79% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.39% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.39% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.39% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
  • 7.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.39% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.39% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.39% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on Tank
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.39% fail on Condition
  • 3.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages