Nissan Tiida MOT Results

Registered in 2010
56.3% pass rate
from 245 tests in 2017
(50% worse than other 2010 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Tiida is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Suspension arms (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Coil springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Front suspension joints (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.41% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames (52 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (86 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.3% fail on Position lamps (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Front lamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.82% fail on Battery (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.82% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.41% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Brakes (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Rear wheels (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.41% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Components (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Pipes (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.41% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on ABS
    • 0.41% fail on Restricted movement
  • 6.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust system (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.41% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.41% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.82% fail on Condition
  • 0.41% fail on Steering
    • 0.41% fail on Steering system
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.41% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.41% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.41% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.41% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.41% fail on Body condition
  • 0.41% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages