Nissan Tiida MOT Results

Registered in 2009
48.6% pass rate
from 438 tests in 2020
(39% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Tiida is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 14% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7.1% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Sub-frames (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (9.7% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Axles
      • 0.23% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps (4.8% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp (9.6% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (28% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (28% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp (14% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 19% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.23% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
    • 6.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.23% fail on Cable
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Parking brake control (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Lever (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Brake fluid (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (18% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Anti-lock braking system (0.65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Tread depth (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers (91% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Transmission
      • 0.23% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.23% fail on Joints
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
  • 5.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (11% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Spark ignition (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Emissions not tested (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Compression ignition (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.23% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.91% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.91% fail on Steering (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Steering linkage components (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack

Search Good Garages