Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.7% pass rate
from 1,035 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 16% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 13% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
      • 0.097% fail on Presence
    • 14% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 14% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 14% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Couplings (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.097% fail on Universal joint
    • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (29 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
    • 0.77% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.39% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
    • 0.29% fail on General condition (69 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
    • 0.097% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
    • 0.097% fail on Axles
      • 0.097% fail on Clearance
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear lamps (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.097% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.097% fail on Tell tales
    • 1.6% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.87% fail on Headlamps (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Headlamp (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.097% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plate lamp (89% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 18% fail on Brakes (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Components (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Pipes (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Hoses
        • 0.097% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.097% fail on Pump
      • 0.77% fail on Leaks (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.77% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.48% fail on Brake operation (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas (343 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (580 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (92 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (78 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.097% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.6% fail on ABS
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
        • 0.19% fail on Condition
        • 0.19% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.097% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.097% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.097% fail on Lever
  • 13% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 6.3% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Condition
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pipe (46 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on System (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Tank
      • 0.097% fail on Hose
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions
    • 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.2% fail on Steering (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Steering system (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Drag link end (23 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Free play (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Steering box (366 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Other components (23 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Steering pivot point (27 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.097% fail on Steering box
      • 0.097% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.097% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
      • 0.097% fail on Drive system
      • 0.097% fail on Pump
    • 0.39% fail on Locking devices (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.68% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.39% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.097% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 5.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Vehicle structure (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Passengers (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers
    • 0.58% fail on Doors
      • 0.58% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.097% fail on Body security
  • 1.2% fail on Towbars (93 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (179 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Towbar
  • 0.97% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.97% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages