MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Terrano » 2005

Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 2005
53.9% pass rate
from 577 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 14% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.69% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.35% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.69% fail on Pins and bushes (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Springs (78% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Coil springs (85% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Mounting (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.17% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.17% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.17% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.35% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Transmission (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Drive shaft (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Prop shaft (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Chassis (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Chassis condition (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.87% fail on Pipe (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Hose (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.52% fail on Door condition
      • 0.35% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.35% fail on Door condition
      • 0.17% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
    • 0.52% fail on Seats
      • 0.35% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.35% fail on Cabs (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Towbar
      • 0.17% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.17% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Panel
    • 0.17% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.17% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.17% fail on Undertray
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.52% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt
          • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.3% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (72 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas (155 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (259 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Other braking system component (197 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.87% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.87% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.69% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.69% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.35% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.17% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 12% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.35% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Headlamps (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Position lamp
  • 10% fail on Steering (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Drag link end (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Intermediate drop arm (310 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
        • 0.17% fail on Steering component
    • 0.69% fail on Steering play (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Steering box (172 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas (41 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.35% fail on Other components
    • 0.17% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.17% fail on Steering box
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.87% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (51% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.69% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.69% fail on Other leaks (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages