Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.1% pass rate
from 1,071 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 15% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Condition
    • 9.0% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Front drive shafts (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Couplings
      • 0.37% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Universal joint (73 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.8% fail on Prescribed areas (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Component mounting (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Spring mounting (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings (76% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (93% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (43% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (53% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 2.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.56% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Location
    • 0.56% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.47% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.093% fail on Condition
      • 0.093% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on General condition (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Rear lamps (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on All position lamps (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual lamps (91% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Fog lamp (89% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.093% fail on Switch
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (62% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Horn (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.093% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 0.65% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.56% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Trailer electrical socket (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.093% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Components (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Pipes (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses
        • 0.093% fail on Valves
      • 0.65% fail on Leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance (31% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels (48% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.093% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake drums (17 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas (18 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (29 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.093% fail on Pedal
        • 0.093% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (79% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pipe (28 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on System (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Hose
      • 0.093% fail on Cap
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions (62% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 9.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Attachment
    • 2.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (76% worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 6.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 7.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers (35% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Windscreen (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.093% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.1% fail on Steering (43% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Steering system (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.47% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Free play
        • 0.37% fail on Steering box (70 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Intermediate drop arm (49 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Steering pivot point (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Power steering
      • 0.37% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.093% fail on Other components
    • 0.28% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.093% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers
      • 0.093% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.093% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.28% fail on Body security (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Speedometer (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.47% fail on Towbars (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Towbar (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.093% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages