Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 2000
48.9% pass rate
from 657 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 15% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Presence (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.3% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.3% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (58% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts (57% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (57% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (64% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Location
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.61% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.30% fail on General condition (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Rear lamps (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.4% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.46% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Fog lamp (94% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Horn (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Battery
    • 0.61% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.61% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.30% fail on Trailer electrical socket (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 9.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (50% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Components (45% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Pipes (58% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Hoses
        • 0.46% fail on Valves
        • 0.30% fail on Cylinders (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 8.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.46% fail on Brake drums (32 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.15% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 2.6% fail on ABS
    • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.61% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Doors
      • 0.76% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.61% fail on Body security (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Speedometer
  • 14% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 14% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.15% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.9% fail on Exhaust system (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on System (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Hose (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions (81% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.9% fail on Steering (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Steering system (59% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.46% fail on Free play
        • 0.46% fail on Steering box (40 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Other components (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Steering pivot point (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering box
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.61% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
    • 0.46% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (41% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (62% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.91% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.91% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.46% fail on Towbars
    • 0.30% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages