Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 2000
57.3% pass rate
from 328 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Direction indicators (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Flashing type (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.91% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.30% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.30% fail on Switch
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Transmission
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Joints
      • 0.30% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Prop shaft
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.1% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Pipe
      • 0.61% fail on System (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Mounting fixings (74 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Other body component
    • 0.61% fail on Towbar
      • 0.61% fail on Towbar condition (100 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Floor
    • 0.61% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.30% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Springs
      • 0.61% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.30% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.30% fail on Mounting
      • 0.61% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.30% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.30% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.91% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.61% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.7% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (26 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (30 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Other braking system component (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.91% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.61% fail on Mechanical brake components (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.61% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
      • 0.30% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.30% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.30% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 7.3% fail on Steering (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Steering linkage components (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.61% fail on Intermediate drop arm (44 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Other components
        • 0.30% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.30% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 0.91% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.61% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.30% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.30% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.30% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (50% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (53% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.30% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition (75% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.61% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.91% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 0.61% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages