Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.2% pass rate
from 602 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Anti-roll bars (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage condition
    • 6.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.2% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.17% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (56% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (57% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 1.00% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.33% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Location
    • 0.17% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 22% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Parking brake performance (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Rear wheels (58% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.17% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 8.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.6% fail on Components
        • 6.1% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.83% fail on Valves
        • 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.00% fail on Leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.50% fail on Brake drums (27 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 1.00% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.00% fail on Condition
    • 1.00% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Condition
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (21% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.17% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (77% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.00% fail on Battery
    • 0.50% fail on Horn
    • 0.33% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.17% fail on Lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 15% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 14% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 1.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 11% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Vehicle structure (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Body security
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (61% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pipe (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on System (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Tank
    • 1.00% fail on Emissions (85% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.50% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.50% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.6% fail on Steering
    • 5.8% fail on Steering system
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end (82% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.17% fail on Steering component
      • 0.17% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
    • 0.33% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment
  • 0.17% fail on Towbars
    • 0.17% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages