Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 1999

49.3% pass rate

from 148 tests in 2021

(29% worse than other 1999 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

29% fail on Body, chassis, structure (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
- 4.1% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 4.1% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Transmission
  - 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
    - 3.4% fail on Joints
  - 0.68% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.68% fail on Prop shaft
- 3.4% fail on Cabs (27 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas (29 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Tank (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.68% fail on Pipe
  - 0.68% fail on System
- 2.0% fail on Bumpers (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Doors
  - 1.4% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 1.4% fail on Door condition
  - 0.68% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.68% fail on Door condition
- 0.68% fail on Body
  - 0.68% fail on Other body component
- 0.68% fail on Floor
20% fail on Suspension
- 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 6.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 2.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.4% fail on Suspension arm
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Springs
  - 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.68% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.68% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.68% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.68% fail on Ball joint
18% fail on Brakes
- 9.5% fail on Brake performance
  - 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 6.1% fail on Rbt
      - 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 0.68% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
  - 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
    - 0.68% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.68% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.68% fail on Rbt
      - 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
- 6.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.0% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 1.4% fail on Other braking system component (20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 0.68% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.68% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.68% fail on Pedal
- 0.68% fail on Load sensing valves
- 0.68% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.68% fail on Anti-lock braking system
16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.1% fail on Headlamps
  - 4.1% fail on Headlamp
- 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.7% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.68% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.68% fail on Horn
- 0.68% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.68% fail on Switch
- 0.68% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
14% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 13% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 12% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.68% fail on Condition
- 0.68% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 4.7% fail on Compression ignition (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 3.4% fail on Emissions not tested (23 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 2.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.68% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.68% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.68% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
5.4% fail on Visibility
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.68% fail on View to rear
  - 0.68% fail on Mirrors
4.1% fail on Steering
- 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.7% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.68% fail on Drag link end
  - 0.68% fail on Locking devices
2.7% fail on Tyres
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth
0.68% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.68% fail on Attachment