Nissan Terrano MOT Results
Registered in 199950.2% pass rate
from 602 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Suspension
-
14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage condition
-
6.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 5.6% fail on Component mounting
- 1.2% fail on Spring mounting (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 3.2% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.17% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.8% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(56% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (57% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
1.00% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.33% fail on
Coil springs
(88% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Location
-
0.17% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
22% fail on
Brakes
(26% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(49% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Parking brake performance (57% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Rear wheels (58% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Front wheels
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.17% fail on Parking brake operation
-
8.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.6% fail on
Components
- 6.1% fail on Pipes
- 1.2% fail on Hoses
- 0.83% fail on Valves
- 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.00% fail on Leaks
- 0.50% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
7.6% fail on
Components
-
2.2% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
- 0.50% fail on Brake drums (27 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Brake discs
- 0.17% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
2.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
(26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on ABS
-
1.00% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.00% fail on Condition
- 1.00% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(49% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(21% better than other 1999 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.2% fail on Front lamps
- 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.17% fail on All position lamps
- 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
(61% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.17% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (77% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.00% fail on Battery
- 0.50% fail on Horn
-
0.33% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.17% fail on Lamp
- 0.17% fail on Switch
- 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
-
15% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 13% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
1.5% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
14% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 11% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Vehicle structure
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Chassis (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Body security
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.17% fail on Passengers
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (61% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Pipe (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.00% fail on System (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Tank
- 1.00% fail on Emissions (85% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers
- 0.50% fail on Windscreen
- 0.50% fail on Mirrors
-
6.6% fail on
Steering
-
5.8% fail on
Steering system
- 4.2% fail on Track rod end (82% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Ball joint
-
0.33% fail on
Other components
(6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.17% fail on Steering component
- 0.17% fail on Steering arm
-
0.33% fail on
Power steering
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Other components
- 0.33% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Steering operation
- 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.8% fail on
Steering system
-
6.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Valve stem
-
2.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.50% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.50% fail on Attachment
-
0.17% fail on
Towbars
- 0.17% fail on Towbar