Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 1998
54.7% pass rate
from 201 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.00% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.50% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.00% fail on Springs
      • 0.50% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.50% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.50% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.00% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 20% fail on Brakes (49% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (74% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 7.0% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.00% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.00% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.50% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.00% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.00% fail on Lever
    • 1.00% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.50% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.50% fail on Pedal
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.50% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.50% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.50% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.50% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.50% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (74% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 10.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 10.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Chassis
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.00% fail on Pipe
      • 1.00% fail on System (14 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 1.5% fail on Other passenger's door (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Transmission
      • 1.00% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.00% fail on Joints
    • 1.00% fail on Body
      • 1.00% fail on Mounting fixings (32 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Cabs (12 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Steps
      • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.50% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.50% fail on Towbar
      • 0.50% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 16% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 15% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.00% fail on Horn
      • 0.50% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.50% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.50% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.5% fail on Steering (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.00% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.50% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.00% fail on Steering play (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Steering box (26 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on View to rear (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Mirrors (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.50% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.5% fail on Compression ignition (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested (19 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 1.00% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.50% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition (72% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (75% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 1.00% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.50% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.00% fail on Condition
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages