Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 1997
51.9% pass rate
from 258 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 10% fail on Components (88% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Hoses
        • 1.2% fail on Valves
        • 0.39% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.9% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Operation
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.78% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Hub components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (9 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS
    • 0.78% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.78% fail on Pedal
        • 0.78% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage condition (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.78% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.9% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.39% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.39% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.78% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Rear lamps (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.39% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.39% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (69% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 0.39% fail on Battery
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.39% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.39% fail on Switch
  • 17% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (62% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Emissions
    • 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
  • 15% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (200% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 11% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Body security (9 times worse than other 1997 cars)
  • 12% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.39% fail on Requirements
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 0.39% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.39% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 7.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering system
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Steering box
      • 0.39% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.39% fail on Other components
        • 0.39% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.78% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Operation
      • 0.39% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.78% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.39% fail on Towbars
    • 0.39% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages