Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 1995
55.4% pass rate
from 65 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint (16 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.5% fail on Axles
      • 1.5% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.5% fail on Pipe
      • 1.5% fail on System
    • 3.1% fail on Transmission
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Joints
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Cabs
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (16 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.2% fail on Compression ignition (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 3.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.5% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.5% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 1.5% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.5% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages