Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 1995
55.9% pass rate
from 102 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 5.9% fail on Fog lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Battery
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.98% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.98% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.98% fail on Attachment
      • 0.98% fail on Linkage condition
    • 6.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.0% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.9% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.9% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.98% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.98% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.98% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.98% fail on Attachment
    • 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.98% fail on Front
    • 0.98% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.8% fail on Components
        • 6.9% fail on Pipes
        • 2.9% fail on Hoses
        • 0.98% fail on Valves
      • 0.98% fail on Leaks
    • 8.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.98% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.98% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Service brake control components (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Anti-slip (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 13% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions
    • 2.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.9% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 6.9% fail on Body condition
    • 2.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis
    • 2.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.98% fail on Drivers
      • 0.98% fail on Passengers other
  • 8.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.98% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.9% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering system
      • 0.98% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.98% fail on Other components
        • 0.98% fail on Steering pivot point
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.98% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.98% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages