Nissan Sunny MOT Results
Registered in 199254.6% pass rate
from 163 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Sunny is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(61% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 11% fail on Component mounting (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Subframe mounting
- 1.2% fail on Spring mounting
-
9.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 9.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.61% fail on Location
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
6.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.61% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.5% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.61% fail on Tell tale
- 1.8% fail on Battery
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp
-
0.61% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.61% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.61% fail on Switch
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.61% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.61% fail on Individual lamps
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.61% fail on Horn
-
6.1% fail on
Position lamps
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.0% fail on Front wheels (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.61% fail on Brake imbalance
-
5.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.3% fail on
Components
- 3.7% fail on Pipes
- 1.2% fail on Hoses
- 0.61% fail on Cylinders
- 0.61% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.2% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.61% fail on Leaks
-
4.3% fail on
Components
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.61% fail on Brake discs
- 0.61% fail on Restricted movement
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
17% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(75% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Emissions (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.61% fail on Cap
-
9.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(160% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.61% fail on Requirements
-
9.8% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.1% fail on Wipers
- 1.2% fail on Washers
- 0.61% fail on Mirrors
-
5.5% fail on
Steering
-
5.5% fail on
Steering system
- 5.5% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Track rod end
-
5.5% fail on
Steering system
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 3.1% fail on Condition
-
3.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.1% fail on Body condition
-
0.61% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.61% fail on Chassis
-
0.61% fail on
Doors
- 0.61% fail on Passengers front
-
0.61% fail on
Seats
- 0.61% fail on Passengers
-
0.61% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.61% fail on Registration plate