MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Skyline » 1995

Nissan Skyline MOT Results

Registered in 1995
78.4% pass rate
from 464 tests in 2020
(44% better than other 1995 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Skyline is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.43% fail on Switch
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.22% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Horn
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.86% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.22% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.65% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.43% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 1995 cars)
  • 7.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.86% fail on Emission control equipment (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.65% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.43% fail on Oxygen sensor (16 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.43% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.65% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.65% fail on Emission control equipment (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Catalytic converter (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 6.5% fail on Suspension (51% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (65% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.65% fail on Springs
      • 0.43% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.43% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.22% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.65% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.65% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility (48% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers (71% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (67% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
    • 0.86% fail on Exhaust system (77% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.65% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.65% fail on Chassis
      • 0.65% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.43% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
    • 0.22% fail on Floor
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 3.2% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.86% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.86% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.86% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Operation
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 2.6% fail on Brakes (79% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.86% fail on Brake performance (88% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (86% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.43% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.22% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.22% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.22% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.22% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (56% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Airbags
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp

Search Good Garages