Nissan Qashqai MOT Results
Registered in 201684.5% pass rate
from 58,640 tests in 2021
(3.1% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Qashqai is unusually good or bad.
-
5.6% fail on
Visibility
(42% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Wipers (55% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Washers (25% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.039% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0017% fail on Window
-
0.0085% fail on
View to rear
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Mirrors (75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Driver's view
- 0.0034% fail on Bonnet (81% better than other 2016 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brakes
(34% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(64% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(83% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads (84% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Brake linings
-
0.45% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.45% fail on Brake discs
- 0.0034% fail on Brake drums
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(83% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Brake performance
(29% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Service brake performance
(24% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Rbt
(25% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (28% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.0085% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0068% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.0017% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.30% fail on
Rbt
(25% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0017% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.053% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.051% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.031% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.022% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0017% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.0017% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.051% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.048% fail on
Parking brake performance
(51% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance (45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0017% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0017% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.048% fail on
Rbt
(49% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.31% fail on
Service brake performance
(24% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(89% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Anti-lock braking system (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Electronic stability control (92% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.046% fail on
Parking brake control
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Electronic parking brake (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.022% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.010% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.0085% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.0068% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0068% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0017% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(64% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Tyres
(10% better than other 2016 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition (26% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Size/type (61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(44% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(28% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Direction indicators
(20% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(20% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Side repeaters (33% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.0034% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(20% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Headlamps
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0085% fail on Headlamp levelling device (70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (60% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Stop lamp (82% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.048% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Horn
- 0.0085% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0017% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.053% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.053% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.053% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Reversing lamps
(66% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Reversing lamps (65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.012% fail on Position lamp
- 0.0068% fail on Rear reflectors (74% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(28% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension
(49% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Suspension arms
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Pins and bushes (65% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0017% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Springs
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0017% fail on Mounting
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.063% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.051% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0068% fail on Linkage
- 0.0034% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.0017% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.0017% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.038% fail on Wheel bearings (56% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.0085% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0085% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0017% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.0085% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0017% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0017% fail on Ball joint
-
0.0085% fail on
Other suspension component
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0017% fail on
Axles
- 0.0017% fail on Axle
-
0.0017% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0017% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.36% fail on
Suspension arms
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(22% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(24% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Spark ignition
(32% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (35% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Catalyst emissions (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.0068% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.0034% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0017% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.0017% fail on NOx sensor
-
0.38% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (39% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.014% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0034% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.0017% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0017% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
0.62% fail on
Spark ignition
(32% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Noise suppression
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0085% fail on
Fluid leaks
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Engine oil leaks (78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0017% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.0017% fail on Other leaks
-
1.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(24% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(62% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Transmission
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Joints (78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Body
- 0.029% fail on Other body component
- 0.0068% fail on Panel
-
0.029% fail on
Doors
-
0.024% fail on
Front passenger's door
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0051% fail on
Other passenger's door
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Door condition
-
0.024% fail on
Front passenger's door
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Exhaust system (87% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Bumpers
-
0.010% fail on
Seats
- 0.010% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.0034% fail on
Fuel system
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0017% fail on Tank
- 0.0017% fail on Pipe
-
0.0017% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0017% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.0017% fail on
Load security
- 0.0017% fail on Access panel
-
0.0017% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.0017% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
- 0.017% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(27% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Registration plates (27% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(48% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.0017% fail on Attachment
- 0.0017% fail on Requirements
- 0.026% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Steering
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Steering linkage components
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Track rod end (58% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Ball joint
-
0.017% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.017% fail on Steering rack
-
0.0017% fail on
Steering play
- 0.0017% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0017% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.090% fail on
Steering linkage components
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0017% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0017% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Qashqai (2014 - 2021)
Comfortable to drive with a robust interior, good engines, popularity means lots of choice on the used market.