Nissan Primera MOT Results
Registered in 200454.2% pass rate
from 1,136 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Primera is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(22% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Headlamps
(62% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Headlamp (65% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.79% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (96% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.70% fail on Horn
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.088% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (51% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.88% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.88% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
8.7% fail on
Headlamps
(62% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
8.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.97% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.088% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.088% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
-
0.79% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.79% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.79% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
5.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(65% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Brake pads (66% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.62% fail on Brake discs
-
0.26% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.18% fail on Cable
- 0.088% fail on Linkage
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(65% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (60% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.62% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.53% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.35% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.18% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.18% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.088% fail on Lever
-
0.088% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.088% fail on Brake fluid
-
8.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(28% better than other 2004 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.6% fail on Ball joint
- 0.88% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.088% fail on Suspension arm
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.70% fail on Ball joint
- 0.62% fail on Linkage
- 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (77% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.088% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.088% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.70% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint
- 0.18% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.088% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.53% fail on
Springs
(88% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Coil springs
(88% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Coil spring (87% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Coil springs
(88% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.44% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (81% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.088% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.088% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.088% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension arms
-
9.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.5% fail on
Transmission
-
2.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.4% fail on Joints
-
0.088% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.088% fail on Joints
-
2.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.88% fail on
Doors
-
0.44% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.44% fail on Door condition
-
0.26% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.26% fail on Door condition
-
0.18% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.44% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.70% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.62% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Hose
-
0.53% fail on
Engine mounting
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Body
- 0.44% fail on Other body component
- 0.088% fail on Panel
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
- 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.088% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.088% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.088% fail on
Chassis
- 0.088% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.088% fail on Bumpers
-
0.088% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.088% fail on Boot lid condition
-
8.1% fail on
Tyres
(30% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Condition (68% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.70% fail on Size/type (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
-
0.088% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.088% fail on Windscreen
-
6.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.088% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.088% fail on NOx sensor
-
0.97% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.26% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(52% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.88% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Airbags
- 0.088% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.6% fail on
Steering
-
2.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.35% fail on Locking devices (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Ball joint
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.18% fail on Rams (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Operation
- 0.088% fail on Pump
-
0.35% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.35% fail on Steering rack
-
2.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.53% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.53% fail on Registration plates
-
0.44% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
-
0.088% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.088% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Primera (2002 - 2006)
Different looking, but a bit smaller than a Mondeo or Vectra.