Nissan Primera MOT Results
Registered in 199653.2% pass rate
from 331 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Primera is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Prescribed areas
(56% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Component mounting (78% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.30% fail on Spring mounting
-
9.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.7% fail on Condition
-
2.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.30% fail on Linkage condition
- 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.60% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.60% fail on Condition
-
11% fail on
Prescribed areas
(56% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.0% fail on Front lamps
- 0.91% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
- 2.4% fail on Battery
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.91% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.91% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.30% fail on Horn
- 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
8.5% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.7% fail on Front wheels
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(56% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Components
(57% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pipes
- 1.2% fail on Hoses
- 0.30% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Components
(57% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.60% fail on Brake discs
- 0.30% fail on Brake calipers
- 1.8% fail on ABS
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.60% fail on Restricted movement
-
8.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 0.30% fail on Mirrors
-
8.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
8.2% fail on
Seat belts
(67% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Prescribed areas (84% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Condition
-
8.2% fail on
Seat belts
(67% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.7% fail on Emissions
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.91% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.30% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.30% fail on Cap
-
5.7% fail on
Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Valve stem
-
4.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.6% fail on Body condition
-
0.91% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.91% fail on Chassis
- 0.30% fail on Body security
-
0.30% fail on
Load security
- 0.30% fail on Bootlid
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(75% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Power steering
- 0.91% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Steering system
- 0.30% fail on Steering rack
-
0.91% fail on
Power steering
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate