MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Primera » 1996

Nissan Primera MOT Results

Registered in 1996
53.2% pass rate
from 331 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Primera is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (56% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Component mounting (78% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.30% fail on Spring mounting
    • 9.7% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Front drive shafts (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.60% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.91% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Battery
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.91% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Horn
    • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (56% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Components (57% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
      • 0.30% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.30% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.8% fail on ABS
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Restricted movement
  • 8.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 8.2% fail on Seat belts (67% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Prescribed areas (84% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
  • 8.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.7% fail on Emissions
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.91% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Cap
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.6% fail on Body condition
    • 0.91% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.91% fail on Chassis
    • 0.30% fail on Body security
    • 0.30% fail on Load security
      • 0.30% fail on Bootlid
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (75% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Power steering
      • 0.91% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering system
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages