Nissan Pixo MOT Results
Registered in 201280.0% pass rate
from 1,623 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pixo is unusually good or bad.
-
7.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(66% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Washers
- 0.25% fail on Windscreen
-
6.0% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(26% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Horn (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.92% fail on Front lamps
- 0.12% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.74% fail on Registration plate lamp (60% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Headlamps
(87% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.12% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.12% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2012 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
- 0.062% fail on Valve stem
-
3.6% fail on
Brakes
-
1.5% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.062% fail on Brake linings
- 0.062% fail on Brake discs
- 0.062% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.062% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
1.4% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.62% fail on Front wheels
- 0.43% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.062% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.062% fail on Brake operation
- 0.062% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.49% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.37% fail on
Components
- 0.31% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Hoses
- 0.062% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.062% fail on Operation
-
0.37% fail on
Components
- 0.25% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.18% fail on
Pedal
- 0.18% fail on Condition (45 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Pedal
- 0.12% fail on ABS
-
0.062% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.062% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Hub components
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension
(33% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Wheel bearings
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Front (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.062% fail on Attachment
-
0.43% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.43% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.43% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.43% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.37% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.37% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.18% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.062% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.86% fail on
Wheel bearings
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.31% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.31% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.062% fail on Condition
- 0.062% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.31% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.37% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.37% fail on
Doors
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Drivers (14 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Passengers other
-
0.37% fail on
Doors
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.31% fail on Registration plate
-
0.25% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.062% fail on Condition
-
0.062% fail on
Steering
-
0.062% fail on
Steering system
- 0.062% fail on Track rod end
-
0.062% fail on
Steering system
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Pixo (2009 - 2013)
Cheap to buy new, low CO2 emissions and high economy mean it's cheap to run. Available with an automatic gearbox. Nicer seats than near identical Suzuki Alto.