Nissan Pixo MOT Results

Registered in 2012
80.0% pass rate
from 1,623 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pixo is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (66% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.0% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Horn (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.92% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate lamp (60% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamps (87% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Individual lamps
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
    • 0.062% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.6% fail on Brakes
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.062% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.062% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.062% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.062% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.43% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.062% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.062% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.062% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.37% fail on Components
        • 0.31% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Hoses
      • 0.062% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.062% fail on Operation
    • 0.25% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Condition (45 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on ABS
    • 0.062% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.062% fail on Condition
  • 2.4% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Front (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.43% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.43% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.43% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.062% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 0.43% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.31% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.31% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.062% fail on Condition
      • 0.062% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.37% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.37% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Drivers (14 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.31% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.062% fail on Condition
  • 0.062% fail on Steering
    • 0.062% fail on Steering system
      • 0.062% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

  • Nissan Pixo (2009 - 2013)
    Cheap to buy new, low CO2 emissions and high economy mean it's cheap to run. Available with an automatic gearbox. Nicer seats than near identical Suzuki Alto.

    Search Good Garages