Nissan Pixo MOT Results

Registered in 2011
77.8% pass rate
from 1,904 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pixo is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.8% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (56% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.053% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.5% fail on Horn (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Headlamps (73% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Battery
    • 0.11% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.053% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.053% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.053% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.053% fail on Switch
  • 7.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (63% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Components (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Pipes (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Hoses
        • 0.053% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.26% fail on Operation (21 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components (40% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.16% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.68% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.53% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.26% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.053% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.053% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.053% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Rear
    • 0.58% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.42% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.42% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.053% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.053% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.32% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.053% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.053% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.053% fail on Location
  • 0.84% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (100% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (200% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.32% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.16% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
    • 0.053% fail on Body security
  • 0.32% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (64% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Emissions
    • 0.053% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.053% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.053% fail on Hose
    • 0.053% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.32% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.16% fail on Steering
    • 0.11% fail on Steering system
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.053% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.053% fail on Locking devices
Read the Honest John Review

  • Nissan Pixo (2009 - 2013)
    Cheap to buy new, low CO2 emissions and high economy mean it's cheap to run. Available with an automatic gearbox. Nicer seats than near identical Suzuki Alto.

    Search Good Garages