Nissan Patrol MOT Results
Registered in 200260.9% pass rate
from 161 tests in 2017
(21% better than other 2002 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Patrol is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(36% better than other 2002 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 9.3% fail on Front lamps
- 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.62% fail on Switch
- 9.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (76% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Horn
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.62% fail on Battery
-
0.62% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.62% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
9.9% fail on
Position lamps
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.9% fail on
Components
- 8.1% fail on Pipes
- 3.7% fail on Valves (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.9% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Components
-
6.2% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front wheels
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.62% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.62% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.62% fail on ABS
-
0.62% fail on
Hub components
- 0.62% fail on Brake pads
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(43% better than other 2002 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 3.1% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.1% fail on Condition
-
2.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting
- 0.62% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.62% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.62% fail on Other components
-
0.62% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.62% fail on
Axles
- 0.62% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
6.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
8.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
-
7.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.9% fail on Chassis
-
6.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.62% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
6.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.1% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on System (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pipe (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.3% fail on
Steering
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 1.2% fail on Drag link end (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Ball joint
-
0.62% fail on
Other components
- 0.62% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
- 0.62% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
-
3.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Tyres
(80% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
-
0.62% fail on
Towbars
- 0.62% fail on Towbar