Nissan Patrol MOT Results

Registered in 2002
60.9% pass rate
from 161 tests in 2017
(21% better than other 2002 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Patrol is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (36% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 9.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.62% fail on Switch
    • 9.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (76% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.62% fail on Battery
    • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.62% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.9% fail on Components
        • 8.1% fail on Pipes
        • 3.7% fail on Valves (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.9% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.62% fail on Rear wheels
    • 0.62% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.62% fail on ABS
    • 0.62% fail on Hub components
      • 0.62% fail on Brake pads
  • 12% fail on Suspension (43% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.1% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.62% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.62% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.62% fail on Other components
    • 0.62% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.62% fail on Axles
      • 0.62% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 8.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis
  • 6.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 6.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on System (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pipe (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 3.7% fail on Steering system
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Drag link end (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.62% fail on Other components
        • 0.62% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.62% fail on Power steering
      • 0.62% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 3.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres (80% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.62% fail on Towbars
    • 0.62% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages