Nissan Pathfinder MOT Results
Registered in 201464.1% pass rate
from 348 tests in 2021
(64% worse than other 2014 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2014 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pathfinder is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(2 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
11% fail on
Springs
(3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 11% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 2014 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (7 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.29% fail on Linkage
-
1.4% fail on
Other suspension component
(19 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint (38 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings
-
11% fail on
Springs
(3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(72% worse than other 2014 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(4 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
(4 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
(4 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (10 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.57% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.57% fail on Reversing lamps
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
6.0% fail on
Brakes
-
4.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.57% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
- 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
-
0.57% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.57% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (30 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
- 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
-
0.57% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.29% fail on Hand lever
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.29% fail on Lever
- 0.29% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.29% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
4.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.9% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
- 2.6% fail on Washers
- 1.1% fail on Wipers
- 0.57% fail on Bonnet (20 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.29% fail on Windscreen
-
4.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(170% worse than other 2014 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Transmission
(190% worse than other 2014 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Prop shafts
(54 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Joints (79 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Prop shaft
-
2.0% fail on
Prop shafts
(54 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.57% fail on
Doors
(5 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Other passenger's door
(12 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Door condition (13 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Other passenger's door
(12 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Chassis
- 0.29% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.29% fail on
Body
- 0.29% fail on Other body component
-
0.29% fail on
Seats
- 0.29% fail on Passenger's seat
-
2.0% fail on
Transmission
(190% worse than other 2014 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.86% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.29% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.29% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.86% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.57% fail on
Fluid leaks
(8 times worse than other 2014 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks (11 times worse than other 2014 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.57% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.57% fail on Registration plates
-
0.57% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Pathfinder (2005 - 2014)
Rugged looks. Seven seats. Strong build. Tidy handling and very capable off road. Good value for money.