Nissan Pathfinder MOT Results
Registered in 201383.3% pass rate
from 366 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pathfinder is unusually good or bad.
-
5.5% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
-
0.82% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(14 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (15 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp
-
0.82% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(14 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.55% fail on Front lamps
- 0.27% fail on Rear lamps
-
0.82% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.55% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.27% fail on Horn
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Brakes
(93% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Hub components
- 3.8% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Brake discs
-
0.82% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.55% fail on Electronic stability system (14 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.27% fail on
Components
- 0.27% fail on Hoses
-
0.27% fail on
Components
-
3.8% fail on
Hub components
-
4.4% fail on
Suspension
(170% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(13 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (14 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.27% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.27% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.27% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.27% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.27% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
3.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(13 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
3.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 0.55% fail on Washers
-
0.27% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.27% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.27% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.27% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.27% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.27% fail on
Doors
- 0.27% fail on Passengers other
-
0.27% fail on
Doors
-
0.27% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.27% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Pathfinder (2005 - 2014)
Rugged looks. Seven seats. Strong build. Tidy handling and very capable off road. Good value for money.