Nissan Pathfinder MOT Results
Registered in 201274.7% pass rate
from 375 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pathfinder is unusually good or bad.
-
8.5% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.1% fail on Front lamps
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
-
0.53% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(27 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (55 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.53% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.53% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.27% fail on Battery
-
7.7% fail on
Suspension
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
(180% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.27% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.27% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.27% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.27% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.27% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
(180% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.53% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2012 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Washers
- 0.53% fail on Mirrors (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Bonnet
- 0.27% fail on Windscreen
-
4.5% fail on
Brakes
-
3.7% fail on
Hub components
- 3.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.27% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Front wheels
- 0.27% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.27% fail on
Components
- 0.27% fail on Hoses
-
0.27% fail on
Components
-
3.7% fail on
Hub components
-
1.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
(23 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Passengers other (69 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
(23 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.80% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.53% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.27% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.80% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.53% fail on Registration plate
-
0.27% fail on
Steering
-
0.27% fail on
Steering system
- 0.27% fail on Track rod end
-
0.27% fail on
Steering system
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Pathfinder (2005 - 2014)
Rugged looks. Seven seats. Strong build. Tidy handling and very capable off road. Good value for money.