Nissan Pathfinder MOT Results
Registered in 201159.7% pass rate
from 690 tests in 2021
(27% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pathfinder is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(85% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
11% fail on
Springs
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 11% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Ball joint
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.87% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.58% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.58% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.14% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
11% fail on
Springs
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(91% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
(91% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
(91% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (20 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(190% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.43% fail on Trailer electrical socket (36 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.14% fail on Horn
-
0.14% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps
-
9.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(190% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Prop shafts
(51 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Joints (49 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Prop shaft (67 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Flexible couplings
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.7% fail on Joints
-
2.8% fail on
Prop shafts
(51 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Doors
(13 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Other passenger's door
(37 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Door condition (38 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
2.2% fail on
Other passenger's door
(37 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.58% fail on Tank (19 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Chassis
(19 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Chassis condition (21 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.14% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.14% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.14% fail on
Towbar
- 0.14% fail on Other towbar components
-
4.1% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Visibility
(78% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.29% fail on Bonnet
-
0.14% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.14% fail on Windscreen
-
8.3% fail on
Brakes
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.5% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
3.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
3.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.43% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
- 0.87% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.72% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.72% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.43% fail on Hand lever
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.14% fail on Lever
-
0.14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
6.8% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
-
6.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.7% fail on Condition
-
4.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(97% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(97% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.72% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(97% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(150% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.72% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.72% fail on Registration plates
-
0.43% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.43% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Pathfinder (2005 - 2014)
Rugged looks. Seven seats. Strong build. Tidy handling and very capable off road. Good value for money.