Nissan Pathfinder MOT Results

Registered in 2010

58.8% pass rate

from 537 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pathfinder is unusually good or bad.

19% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Springs (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 8.2% fail on Coil springs (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 8.2% fail on Coil spring (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Suspension arms (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 7.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.56% fail on Linkage
  - 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.74% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.5% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.93% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.93% fail on Headlamp levelling device (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.2% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
    - 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.93% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.93% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.19% fail on Position lamp
- 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
8.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Transmission (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Drive shafts
    - 2.2% fail on Joints
  - 2.0% fail on Prop shafts (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 1.7% fail on Joints (31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.37% fail on Prop shaft (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Doors (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Other passenger's door (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 2.0% fail on Door condition (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.19% fail on Door condition
  - 0.19% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.19% fail on Door condition
- 0.37% fail on Chassis (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Chassis condition (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.37% fail on Tank (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Bumpers
- 0.19% fail on Spare wheel
  - 0.19% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.19% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.19% fail on Bracket
- 0.19% fail on Body
  - 0.19% fail on Panel
8.4% fail on Brakes
- 3.4% fail on Brake performance
  - 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.74% fail on Rbt (sp)
    - 0.56% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.1% fail on Rbt
      - 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.74% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.74% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.56% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.19% fail on Rbt
      - 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.74% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.56% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.37% fail on Hand lever
  - 0.19% fail on Pedal
- 0.19% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.19% fail on Lever
8.2% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 7.4% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 0.19% fail on Power steering
  - 0.19% fail on Other components
- 0.19% fail on Steering column
- 0.19% fail on Steering play
  - 0.19% fail on Steering rack
7.8% fail on Visibility
- 5.8% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.37% fail on View to rear
  - 0.37% fail on Mirrors
- 0.19% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.19% fail on Windscreen
6.7% fail on Tyres
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 5.0% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.93% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  - 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
    - 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.19% fail on Other leaks
2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.93% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Airbags
  - 0.19% fail on Drivers airbag
0.93% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.93% fail on Registration plates
0.37% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.37% fail on Attachment