Nissan Pathfinder MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.1% pass rate
from 464 tests in 2017
(30% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pathfinder is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (32 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.86% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.22% fail on Horn
  • 13% fail on Suspension (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.86% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.65% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.65% fail on Front
    • 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
  • 9.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Washers (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.6% fail on Brakes
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.22% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Components
        • 0.43% fail on Pipes
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
    • 0.22% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.22% fail on ABS
  • 3.9% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Free play
        • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.7% fail on Steering control (96 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Steering coupling (208 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Flexible coupling (1612 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Universal joint (89 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Steering shaft (483 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Doors (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Passengers other (41 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Drivers (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.22% fail on Body condition
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers
    • 0.22% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.65% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.65% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.65% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.43% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages