Nissan Pathfinder MOT Results
Registered in 200652.2% pass rate
from 1,677 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Pathfinder is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(40% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 6.2% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (77% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 6.7% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Springs
-
6.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.3% fail on Coil spring
- 0.060% fail on Mounting
- 0.12% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
6.3% fail on
Coil springs
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Linkage
- 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.18% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (85% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 3.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Other suspension component
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.72% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.48% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2006 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
-
19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(140% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Chassis
(25 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Chassis condition (25 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Strengthening plate
-
5.4% fail on
Transmission
(60% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(45% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Joints (45% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.83% fail on
Prop shafts
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Prop shaft (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Chains
-
4.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(45% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Exhaust system (60% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Doors
(8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Other passenger's door
(14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Door condition (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Catch
-
0.24% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.24% fail on Door condition
-
0.24% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.24% fail on Door condition
-
3.7% fail on
Other passenger's door
(14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Fuel system
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Tank (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Pipe
-
0.78% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.12% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.060% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.060% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.42% fail on
Seats
- 0.30% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.24% fail on
Towbar
(21 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Other towbar components (18 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure (113 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Cabs
- 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.060% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.060% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.060% fail on Bracket
-
0.060% fail on
Body
- 0.060% fail on Other body component
- 0.060% fail on Undertray
-
7.3% fail on
Chassis
(25 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.1% fail on Stop lamp (46% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (90% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
(39% better than other 2006 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp (39% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(82% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(82% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(82% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(45% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(45% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Individual direction indicators (54% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(45% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
(100% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Horn (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Hazard warning
(8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.12% fail on Position lamp
- 0.060% fail on Rear reflectors
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
(38% better than other 2006 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(48% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (53% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.060% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.060% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.060% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.060% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
-
0.83% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt
- 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.060% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt
- 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.36% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.060% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(48% better than other 2006 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads
-
0.78% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.78% fail on Brake discs
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
3.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(140% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Electronic stability control (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.060% fail on Electronic braking system
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Hand lever
-
0.30% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.30% fail on Lever
- 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.060% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.060% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.060% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.060% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
(38% better than other 2006 cars)
-
10% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Ball joint
-
0.48% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.48% fail on Steering rack
-
0.30% fail on
Power steering
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Other components
-
0.12% fail on
Steering play
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
- 0.060% fail on Electronic power steering
-
9.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Visibility
- 5.2% fail on Washers (53% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.18% fail on Bonnet
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
-
0.060% fail on
View to rear
- 0.060% fail on Mirrors
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(38% better than other 2006 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2006 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.060% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.060% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.060% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.30% fail on
Spark ignition
(94% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (90% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.36% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.12% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.060% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2006 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.95% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.83% fail on Condition
- 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.060% fail on Requirements
-
0.83% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.83% fail on Registration plates
-
0.83% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.78% fail on Attachment
- 0.060% fail on Condition
-
0.060% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.060% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Pathfinder (2005 - 2014)
Rugged looks. Seven seats. Strong build. Tidy handling and very capable off road. Good value for money.