Nissan Note MOT Results
Registered in 201585.1% pass rate
from 15,219 tests in 2021
(26% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Note is unusually good or bad.
-
3.9% fail on
Visibility
- 3.1% fail on Wipers (23% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Washers (31% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
View to rear
- 0.013% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0066% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.0066% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.0066% fail on Windscreen
-
2.7% fail on
Tyres
(38% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth (33% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Size/type
-
2.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(49% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.40% fail on
Headlamps
(62% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.17% fail on
Direction indicators
(59% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Flashing type
(59% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (53% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Individual direction indicators (71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Flashing type
(59% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.085% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.059% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(76% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(76% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(76% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.020% fail on Position lamp
-
0.020% fail on
Electrical equipment
(81% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.0066% fail on Horn
-
0.013% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.013% fail on Switch
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension
(29% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(23% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes (60% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0066% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.91% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Springs
(93% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0066% fail on Mounting
-
0.11% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(71% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0066% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.0066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0066% fail on Ball joint
- 0.039% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.0066% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.0066% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.0066% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0066% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0066% fail on Ball joint
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(23% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brakes
(39% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(43% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads (43% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0066% fail on Brake linings
-
0.51% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.51% fail on Brake discs
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(43% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Brake performance
(49% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Service brake performance
(38% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt
(41% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.026% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.026% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.0066% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0066% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt
(41% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(70% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.085% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.072% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.026% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.085% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.046% fail on
Parking brake performance
(71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.046% fail on
Rbt
(70% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.046% fail on
Rbt
(70% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.38% fail on
Service brake performance
(38% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.066% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.020% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.0066% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.072% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.066% fail on Pedal
- 0.0066% fail on Hand lever
-
0.072% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.072% fail on Lever
- 0.046% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.026% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.020% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.013% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.0066% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.013% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.013% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.0066% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.0066% fail on Other components
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(60% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Catalyst emissions (49% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.0066% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.24% fail on
Compression ignition
(47% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.020% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (85% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.0066% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(60% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.039% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.49% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(47% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Transmission
-
0.28% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.27% fail on Joints
- 0.0066% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.0066% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.0066% fail on Joints
-
0.28% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.066% fail on Exhaust system (79% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Bumpers
-
0.026% fail on
Body
- 0.020% fail on Other body component
- 0.0066% fail on Panel
-
0.026% fail on
Doors
-
0.026% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.020% fail on Door condition
- 0.0066% fail on Hinge
-
0.026% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.013% fail on
Fuel system
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0066% fail on Tank
- 0.0066% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.013% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0066% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.0066% fail on Bracket
-
0.013% fail on
Seats
- 0.013% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.013% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.013% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.0066% fail on
Load security
- 0.0066% fail on Loading door
-
0.28% fail on
Transmission
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(43% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.0066% fail on Attachment
- 0.0066% fail on Requirements
- 0.026% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
- 0.0066% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(46% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Registration plates (46% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Steering
(85% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.046% fail on
Steering linkage components
(86% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint
-
0.0066% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.0066% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0066% fail on Steering column
-
0.046% fail on
Steering linkage components
(86% better than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Note (2013 - 2016)
Practical design and spacious cabin. Reasonably comfortable. Clear instrument binnacle. Some clever technology on upper grades.