Nissan Murano MOT Results

Registered in 2010
70.0% pass rate
from 120 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Murano is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.2% fail on Brakes
    • 6.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 5.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 5.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.83% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.83% fail on Pedal
    • 0.83% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.83% fail on Lever
    • 0.83% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.83% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.83% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.83% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 8.3% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Linkage
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.83% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 6.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.83% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.83% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.83% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.83% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.83% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.83% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.7% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.83% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.83% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.83% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.83% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.83% fail on Requirements
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages