Nissan Murano MOT Results

Registered in 2010
81.1% pass rate
from 111 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Murano is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.0% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Front lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Battery (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.90% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.90% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.90% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 5.4% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.5% fail on Brakes
    • 3.6% fail on Hub components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.90% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.90% fail on Rear wheels
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Requirements (94 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
  • 0.90% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.90% fail on Exhaust system
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages