MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Murano » 2009

Nissan Murano MOT Results

Registered in 2009
72.6% pass rate
from 219 tests in 2021
(28% better than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Murano is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.91% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.46% fail on Springs
      • 0.46% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.46% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.46% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.46% fail on Levelling valve
  • 6.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.91% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 1.4% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.46% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.46% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 6.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.7% fail on Joints
        • 0.46% fail on Flexible couplings
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.91% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.91% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.91% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.91% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.91% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.46% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.46% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.46% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.46% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.91% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.46% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.91% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.46% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.46% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages