Nissan Murano MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.6% pass rate
from 250 tests in 2020
(27% better than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Murano is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.8% fail on Suspension
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.40% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
  • 6.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.80% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.80% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 5.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Joints
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Driver's seat
  • 4.8% fail on Brakes
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.80% fail on Rbt
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.40% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt
          • 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
  • 4.4% fail on Steering (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Steering linkage components (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Other components
  • 3.6% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.40% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.40% fail on Undertray
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.40% fail on Requirements
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
  • 0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages