Nissan Murano MOT Results

Registered in 2008
58.8% pass rate
from 216 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Murano is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 7.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.93% fail on Horn
      • 0.46% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.93% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.93% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.93% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.93% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.93% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.93% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 9.7% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.93% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Other components (19 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 6.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
    • 0.46% fail on Doors
      • 0.46% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.46% fail on Driver's seat
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
  • 4.6% fail on Brakes
    • 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.46% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.4% fail on Lever
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.93% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.93% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt
          • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
    • 0.46% fail on Airbags
      • 0.46% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.46% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.46% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.46% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages