Nissan Murano MOT Results
Registered in 200657.8% pass rate
from 332 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Murano is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(76% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
8.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(71% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.30% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.90% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.60% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.30% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(76% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(89% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.30% fail on Joints
-
6.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Seats
(4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Driver's seat (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Doors
-
0.30% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.30% fail on Hinge
-
0.30% fail on
Driver's door
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.60% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.60% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.30% fail on Horn
-
0.30% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(64% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Fluid leaks
(5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Transmission oil leaks (24 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Other leaks
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.9% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Power steering
(6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Pipes and hoses (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Rams
-
0.90% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.90% fail on Steering rack
-
7.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Brakes
-
5.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.60% fail on Brake discs
-
0.30% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.30% fail on Cable
-
4.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.60% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (57 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 0.90% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.30% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 0.90% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.90% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.90% fail on
Rbt
- 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.90% fail on
Rbt
-
0.60% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.90% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.30% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.60% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.60% fail on Hand lever
-
0.60% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.60% fail on Lever
-
5.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.8% fail on
Visibility
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers
-
4.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.60% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.60% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Murano (2005 - 2008)
Road-biased 4x4 that's stuffed to the rafters with luxury kit.