MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Murano » 2006

Nissan Murano MOT Results

Registered in 2006
55.8% pass rate
from 493 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Murano is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (45% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Suspension arms (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (99% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.8% fail on Front suspension joints (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.6% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Rear
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.41% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.20% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.20% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (38% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.41% fail on All position lamps (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (23 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.20% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.61% fail on Battery
    • 0.61% fail on Horn
    • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.41% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.20% fail on Drag link end
    • 2.4% fail on Power steering (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other components (16 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pipes and hoses (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Locking devices
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 6.9% fail on Hub components (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Front wheels
    • 1.0% fail on Electronic stability system (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.81% fail on Condition
    • 0.81% fail on ABS
    • 0.41% fail on Hydraulic systems (86% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Components (85% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Hoses
        • 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.20% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.20% fail on Restricted movement
  • 8.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (87% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (43% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Seats (16 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Drivers (26 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.20% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.20% fail on Body condition
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.81% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.61% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.61% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Requirements
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages