MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Micra » 2009

Nissan Micra MOT Results

Registered in 2009
63.3% pass rate
from 16,954 tests in 2021
(6.8% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Micra is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Springs (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Coil springs (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Coil spring (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Mounting
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Suspension arm (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage ball joints (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0059% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.45% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Sub-frame (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.018% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0059% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.012% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.065% fail on Macpherson strut (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.035% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Axles (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (94% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters (64% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.17% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.018% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps (58% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.094% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Position lamps (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Position lamp (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0059% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.0059% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.0059% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0059% fail on Switch
    • 0.0059% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (20% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.088% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.071% fail on View to rear (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Mirrors (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Bonnet (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (24% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth (15% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (38% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0059% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.90% fail on Brake discs and drums (22% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Brake discs (22% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Service brake performance (62% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (61% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance (35% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0059% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0059% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0059% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance (55% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.018% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.035% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.041% fail on Brake performance not tested (75% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Lever (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.0059% fail on Pedal
    • 0.14% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system (75% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.035% fail on Rigid brake pipes (96% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Hydraulic systems (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Brake fluid (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.018% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.0059% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.0059% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0059% fail on Leaks
    • 0.0059% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.0059% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0059% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.012% fail on Prop shafts (87% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Joints (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0059% fail on Belts
    • 0.15% fail on Doors (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.083% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0059% fail on Catch
        • 0.0059% fail on Hinge
      • 0.029% fail on Front passenger's door (68% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition (74% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0059% fail on Catch
      • 0.029% fail on Other passenger's door (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Door condition (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.029% fail on Tank
      • 0.029% fail on Pipe
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.094% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.024% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.059% fail on Boot lid (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Boot lid condition (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0059% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.047% fail on Body
      • 0.024% fail on Panel
      • 0.018% fail on Other body component (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0059% fail on Body condition
    • 0.029% fail on Integral vehicle structure (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0059% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0059% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0059% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0059% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0059% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0059% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0059% fail on Floor
    • 0.0059% fail on Undertray
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition (58% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Catalyst emissions (61% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested (31% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.50% fail on Compression ignition (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Emissions not tested (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.018% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.012% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.22% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.012% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0059% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.0059% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0059% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.63% fail on Seat belts (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
      • 0.012% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0059% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.48% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.035% fail on Airbags
      • 0.035% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.0059% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Condition
  • 0.14% fail on Steering (94% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Steering linkage components (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0059% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.041% fail on Steering gear (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0059% fail on Operation
  • 0.0059% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0059% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages