Nissan Micra MOT Results
Registered in 199053.2% pass rate
from 299 tests in 2017
(26% worse than other 1990 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Micra is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(62% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
18% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 17% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.67% fail on Spring mounting
-
3.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
(140% worse than other 1990 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.33% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.33% fail on Universal joint
-
2.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.67% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.33% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.33% fail on Condition
-
0.33% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.33% fail on Condition
-
18% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp
-
0.67% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.67% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.7% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Tell tale
- 0.33% fail on Switch
-
3.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.7% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.67% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.7% fail on Front lamps
- 1.0% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 0.33% fail on Battery
-
0.33% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.33% fail on Lamp
- 0.33% fail on Horn
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
8.4% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.0% fail on Front wheels
- 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake
(180% worse than other 1990 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.3% fail on
Components
- 2.3% fail on Pipes
- 0.33% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Components
-
0.33% fail on
Hub components
- 0.33% fail on Brake pads
-
8.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(160% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 1990 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition
-
9.4% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.0% fail on Emissions
- 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.4% fail on Wipers
- 3.7% fail on Washers
-
6.0% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth (130% worse than other 1990 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Condition
-
4.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.3% fail on Body condition
-
2.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.0% fail on Chassis
-
0.67% fail on
Doors
- 0.67% fail on Passengers front
- 0.33% fail on Drivers
- 0.33% fail on Passengers other
-
0.33% fail on
Seats
- 0.33% fail on Passengers
-
1.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
(81% better than other 1990 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Steering system
(84% better than other 1990 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Steering rack
- 0.33% fail on Track rod end
- 0.33% fail on Steering operation
-
0.67% fail on
Steering system
(84% better than other 1990 cars)