Nissan Juke MOT Results

Registered in 2017
90.1% pass rate
from 1,967 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.0% fail on Visibility (72% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Wipers
    • 0.051% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.051% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.051% fail on View to rear
      • 0.051% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 2.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.051% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.46% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.36% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.10% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.10% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.10% fail on Battery(ies) (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.051% fail on Switch
    • 0.051% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 2.3% fail on Brakes (58% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (82% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (93% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (95% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.25% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.41% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.051% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.051% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.051% fail on Rbt
          • 0.051% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.051% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.051% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.051% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.051% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.051% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 1.6% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.56% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.46% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.46% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.25% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.15% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.051% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.051% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.051% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.10% fail on Suspension
    • 0.051% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.051% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.051% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  • 0.051% fail on Steering
    • 0.051% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.051% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.051% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.051% fail on Bumpers
  • 0.051% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.051% fail on Anchorages
  • 0.051% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.051% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages