MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Juke » 2017

Nissan Juke MOT Results

Registered in 2017
85.4% pass rate
from 37,744 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.9% fail on Visibility (87% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (98% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (80% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.042% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.021% fail on View to rear
      • 0.016% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0053% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.019% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.0053% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (38% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (51% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (50% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Brake linings (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.30% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.0079% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0053% fail on Lever
        • 0.0026% fail on Cable
    • 0.65% fail on Brake performance (35% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance (69% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt (69% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance (53% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0079% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0053% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0026% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0026% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0026% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.090% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.090% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.048% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.045% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.090% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.090% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.029% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.019% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.019% fail on Rbt
          • 0.013% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0053% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (91% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0053% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.11% fail on Lever (67% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.056% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.0026% fail on Pedal
    • 0.037% fail on Rigid brake pipes (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.013% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0079% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0053% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.0079% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0053% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0026% fail on Valves
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (18% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Size/type
  • 2.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (14% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (17% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0026% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Headlamps (52% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.013% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (73% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Stop lamp (27% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (59% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (42% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.082% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.032% fail on Battery(ies) (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Horn
      • 0.0079% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0026% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.040% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Individual direction indicators (74% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0026% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.0079% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.0079% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.0079% fail on Reversing lamps (77% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Reversing lamps (77% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0026% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0026% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0026% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 0.45% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (18% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Exhaust emissions (21% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.095% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.024% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.14% fail on Compression ignition (36% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.011% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.040% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Transmission oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0026% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.42% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.093% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.013% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.087% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.082% fail on Anti-roll bars (39% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage ball joints (83% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0053% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0053% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0026% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.016% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Wheel bearings (76% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0079% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.0026% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0026% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.0026% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0026% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.38% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0079% fail on Requirements
    • 0.061% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (42% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels (34% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment (95% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (45% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Doors
      • 0.034% fail on Driver's door (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0026% fail on Hinge
      • 0.0079% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0079% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0053% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0053% fail on Door condition
    • 0.040% fail on Transmission (61% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Drive shafts (59% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Joints (58% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Body
      • 0.016% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Other body component
    • 0.021% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.011% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0079% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0026% fail on Pipe
    • 0.0079% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0053% fail on Seats
      • 0.0053% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.0026% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0026% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.0026% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0026% fail on Strengthening plate
  • 0.15% fail on Steering
    • 0.14% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.0026% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0026% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0026% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0026% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0079% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0079% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0026% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0026% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.12% fail on Identification of the vehicle (43% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Registration plates (43% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.0053% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0053% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages