Nissan Juke MOT Results

Registered in 2016
83.4% pass rate
from 37,382 tests in 2021
(4.0% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (70% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (80% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (61% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.059% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.0027% fail on Window
    • 0.032% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.021% fail on View to rear
      • 0.021% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0080% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.4% fail on Brakes (21% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (22% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (29% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (29% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.41% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.0054% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0054% fail on Cable
    • 0.81% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (24% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (26% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0027% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0027% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0027% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0027% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0027% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.21% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.080% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.072% fail on Rbt
          • 0.064% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0027% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0080% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0080% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.024% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (89% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.011% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.14% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.083% fail on Lever
    • 0.051% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.045% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (45% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.0054% fail on Pedal (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.011% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0054% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.013% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.011% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.0027% fail on Reservoirs
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (14% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Size/type
  • 2.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.019% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Headlamps (67% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (65% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Individual direction indicators (70% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0027% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.037% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.021% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.011% fail on Horn (74% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0027% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0027% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.013% fail on Reversing lamps (71% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0080% fail on Reversing lamps (82% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.0080% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.0080% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.0027% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 1.4% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.096% fail on Anti-roll bars (52% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.027% fail on Linkage ball joints (65% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0054% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0054% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0027% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.062% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.054% fail on Other suspension component (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0027% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.048% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Springs (96% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0080% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0027% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0080% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0054% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.0054% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.0027% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0027% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.64% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (23% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Exhaust emissions (26% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.021% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0027% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0027% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.0027% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.19% fail on Compression ignition (45% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (28% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (92% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0027% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.048% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.021% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.019% fail on Transmission oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.0027% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.42% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (46% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Seat belts (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0027% fail on Requirements
    • 0.045% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0054% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0054% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.38% fail on Steering (40% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Steering linkage components (62% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Track rod end (62% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0027% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.021% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.019% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0027% fail on Operation
    • 0.0027% fail on Power steering
      • 0.0027% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.0027% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0027% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.23% fail on Body, chassis, structure (58% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Doors (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Driver's door (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0027% fail on Catch
      • 0.037% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.027% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0054% fail on Catch (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Hinge (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0054% fail on Door condition
    • 0.048% fail on Transmission (78% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Joints (77% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0027% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.035% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.016% fail on Body
      • 0.016% fail on Other body component
    • 0.0054% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0027% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0027% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0027% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.0027% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0027% fail on Tank
    • 0.0027% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0027% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0027% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0027% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0027% fail on Seats
      • 0.0027% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment (42% worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.19% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.0054% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0054% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages