Nissan Juke MOT Results
Registered in 201683.4% pass rate
from 37,382 tests in 2021
(4.0% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.
-
6.7% fail on
Visibility
(70% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Wipers (80% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Washers (61% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.059% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0027% fail on Window
- 0.032% fail on Bonnet
-
0.021% fail on
View to rear
- 0.021% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0080% fail on Driver's view
-
3.4% fail on
Brakes
(21% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(22% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(29% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads (29% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Brake linings
-
0.41% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.41% fail on Brake discs
-
0.0054% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0054% fail on Cable
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(29% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.51% fail on
Service brake performance
(24% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Rbt
(26% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.0027% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0027% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0027% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0027% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.50% fail on
Rbt
(26% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.056% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.056% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.080% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.072% fail on
Rbt
- 0.064% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.0054% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0027% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.0080% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0080% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.072% fail on
Rbt
- 0.024% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.51% fail on
Service brake performance
(24% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(89% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.011% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.14% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.083% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.083% fail on Lever
- 0.051% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.045% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Hand lever
- 0.0054% fail on Pedal (84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.011% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0054% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.013% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.011% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.0027% fail on Reservoirs
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(22% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
(14% better than other 2016 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
- 1.4% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Size/type
-
2.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(35% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.019% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Headlamps
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.19% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.12% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Direction indicators
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Individual direction indicators (70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.021% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.011% fail on Horn (74% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0027% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.013% fail on
Reversing lamps
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0080% fail on Reversing lamps (82% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0054% fail on Reversing lamp switch
-
0.0080% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0080% fail on Position lamp
- 0.0027% fail on Rear reflectors
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension
(32% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.011% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.096% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(52% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.027% fail on Linkage ball joints (65% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0054% fail on Linkage
- 0.0054% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0027% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.062% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.054% fail on
Other suspension component
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0027% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.048% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Springs
(96% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0080% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0027% fail on Ball joint
-
0.0080% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.0054% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.0027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0054% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.0027% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0027% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(23% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.021% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.0027% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0027% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.0027% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.19% fail on
Compression ignition
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (28% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0054% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (92% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.41% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.048% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.021% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.019% fail on Transmission oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0054% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.0027% fail on Other leaks
-
0.59% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(46% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Requirements
- 0.045% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0054% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0054% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.38% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Steering
(40% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Steering linkage components
(62% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Track rod end (62% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Steering arm
-
0.021% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.019% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0027% fail on Operation
-
0.0027% fail on
Power steering
- 0.0027% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.0027% fail on
Steering play
- 0.0027% fail on Steering rack
-
0.35% fail on
Steering linkage components
(62% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Doors
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Driver's door
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Catch
-
0.037% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.027% fail on Door condition
- 0.0054% fail on Catch (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0054% fail on Hinge (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0054% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0054% fail on Door condition
-
0.056% fail on
Driver's door
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Transmission
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Joints (77% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0027% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.048% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Bumpers
-
0.016% fail on
Body
- 0.016% fail on Other body component
- 0.0054% fail on Undertray
-
0.0027% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.0027% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.0027% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.0027% fail on
Sub-frame
-
0.0027% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.0027% fail on Tank
-
0.0027% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0027% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.0027% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0027% fail on Bracket
-
0.0027% fail on
Seats
- 0.0027% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.096% fail on
Doors
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Attachment (42% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.19% fail on Registration plates
-
0.0054% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0054% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Juke (2010 - 2019)
Loads of choice when buying used thanks to its popularity, bold styling, decent value for money.