Nissan Juke MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.9% pass rate
from 38,292 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.2% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (79% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (88% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads (88% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0078% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.29% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.0052% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0052% fail on Lever
    • 0.58% fail on Brake performance (38% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance (64% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Rbt (67% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance (44% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0026% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0026% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.039% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.037% fail on Rbt
          • 0.031% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0052% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0026% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0026% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.021% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.081% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.081% fail on Lever
    • 0.081% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Electronic stability control (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.037% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (60% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.021% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.018% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.010% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0078% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.018% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0078% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0052% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0026% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.0052% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0026% fail on Other components
      • 0.0026% fail on Additional braking device
  • 3.2% fail on Visibility (12% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers (17% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (81% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.068% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.068% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.034% fail on View to rear
      • 0.034% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (12% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (22% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.024% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.016% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.22% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Headlamps (60% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0052% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (93% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.0026% fail on Switch
    • 0.099% fail on Direction indicators (68% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Flashing type (68% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.073% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Individual direction indicators (60% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0052% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.086% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Position lamps (66% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Position lamp (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.031% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Horn (68% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.0052% fail on Reversing lamps (87% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0026% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0026% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.0026% fail on Daytime running lamps
    • 0.0026% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0026% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0026% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 0.45% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (78% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0026% fail on Attachment
    • 0.026% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0026% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0026% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.32% fail on Suspension (48% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers (31% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.047% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0078% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.055% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.026% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.010% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.0078% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0026% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0026% fail on Linkage
    • 0.016% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0078% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0078% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0078% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0078% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0078% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0026% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0026% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0026% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.26% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (33% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust emissions (36% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Spark ignition (30% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.050% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.010% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0026% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0026% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.10% fail on Compression ignition (41% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.013% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0078% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (83% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0026% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.029% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.024% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0052% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.21% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (44% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on Transmission (49% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Drive shafts (49% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Joints
      • 0.0026% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0026% fail on Joints
    • 0.031% fail on Doors
      • 0.024% fail on Driver's door (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0078% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0078% fail on Door condition
    • 0.029% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.024% fail on Body
      • 0.016% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0078% fail on Panel
    • 0.016% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0052% fail on Tank
      • 0.0052% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0052% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.0078% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0078% fail on Seats
      • 0.0052% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.0026% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.0026% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0026% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0026% fail on Undertray
  • 0.14% fail on Steering
    • 0.12% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.12% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.0052% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.016% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.016% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0026% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0026% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0026% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 0.010% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0078% fail on Belt(s)/padding
    • 0.0026% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages