Nissan Juke MOT Results
Registered in 201579.7% pass rate
from 38,521 tests in 2021
(10% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.
-
6.0% fail on
Visibility
(53% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Wipers (70% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Washers (35% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.057% fail on Windscreen
-
0.026% fail on
View to rear
- 0.026% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0052% fail on Bonnet
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension
(46% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.096% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.018% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.20% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(32% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.060% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.026% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0052% fail on Linkage (79% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
0.17% fail on
Springs
(90% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
(90% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Mounting
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
(90% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0026% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.062% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Wheel bearings (61% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.021% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0078% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0052% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.0052% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.010% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.0052% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.0026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0026% fail on Ball joint
-
0.0052% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0026% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Brakes
(30% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(27% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(40% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads (40% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Brake linings
-
0.48% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(22% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Brake discs (22% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.023% fail on Cable
- 0.010% fail on Lever
- 0.0026% fail on Linkage
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(40% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake performance
(26% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(90% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp) (97% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
- 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (19% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance (48% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.010% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.0052% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
-
0.48% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (200% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Plate brake tester
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.46% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.093% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.093% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.049% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.047% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.093% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.029% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.71% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(90% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Rigid brake pipes (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Parking brake control
(42% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Lever (60% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control (71% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Anti-lock braking system (52% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.13% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.12% fail on Hand lever (72% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Pedal
- 0.044% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.026% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.018% fail on Reservoirs (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.023% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.021% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0026% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.0052% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.0052% fail on Other components
-
0.0026% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0026% fail on Leaks
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(27% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth (24% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (33% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Size/type
-
3.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(34% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.039% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (61% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Headlamps
(60% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.013% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (74% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(32% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(32% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (33% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(32% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (44% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Direction indicators
(74% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Individual direction indicators (86% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Electrical equipment
(55% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Battery(ies) (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0052% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.023% fail on
Reversing lamps
(68% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Reversing lamps (68% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.0078% fail on
Position lamps
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Position lamp
- 0.0052% fail on Rear reflectors (84% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.1% fail on
Steering
(180% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.0026% fail on
Other components
- 0.0026% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.029% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.029% fail on Steering rack
-
0.010% fail on
Power steering
- 0.0078% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Operation
-
0.010% fail on
Steering play
- 0.010% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0026% fail on Electronic power steering
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(13% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(16% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.17% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.052% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.34% fail on
Compression ignition
(26% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.021% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.010% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (92% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0052% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.0026% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.59% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.086% fail on
Fluid leaks
(95% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.021% fail on Transmission oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0052% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.0052% fail on Other leaks
-
0.92% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(16% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(42% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Requirements
- 0.0026% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.080% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (55% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.0026% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0026% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.46% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(54% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
(130% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Driver's door
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Catch
-
0.047% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.042% fail on Door condition
- 0.0026% fail on Catch
- 0.0026% fail on Hinge
-
0.0078% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0052% fail on Door condition
- 0.0026% fail on Catch
-
0.078% fail on
Driver's door
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Exhaust system (67% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.093% fail on
Transmission
(76% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.091% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Joints (74% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.0026% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.0026% fail on Joints
-
0.091% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
Body
- 0.023% fail on Other body component
- 0.010% fail on Panel
- 0.0052% fail on Mounting fixings (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Body condition
- 0.034% fail on Bumpers
-
0.0078% fail on
Chassis
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0052% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.0026% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.0052% fail on
Fuel system
(92% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0052% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (91% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.0052% fail on
Seats
(81% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0052% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.0052% fail on Undertray
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
(130% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
(29% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Attachment (65% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.20% fail on Registration plates
-
0.013% fail on
Seat belt installation check
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Belt(s)/padding (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0026% fail on Anchorages
-
0.0026% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.0026% fail on Speedometer
-
0.0026% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.0026% fail on
Doors
- 0.0026% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.0026% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Juke (2010 - 2019)
Loads of choice when buying used thanks to its popularity, bold styling, decent value for money.