Nissan Juke MOT Results
Registered in 201160.9% pass rate
from 20,000 tests in 2021
(21% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(60% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 10% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (93% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (99% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint (92% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (55% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover (36% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Linkage (71% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (57% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.0050% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0050% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.7% fail on
Springs
(41% better than other 2011 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
(41% better than other 2011 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Coil spring (41% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Mounting (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
(41% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Other suspension component
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0050% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.0050% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0050% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.13% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (100% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0050% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0050% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.080% fail on Wheel bearings (82% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.045% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0050% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.045% fail on Shock absorbers (94% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Sub-frames
(72% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0050% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
14% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Brakes
(40% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(57% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(80% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Brake pads (80% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Brake linings
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(18% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs (19% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.0050% fail on Brake drums
-
0.015% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(80% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Lever
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(80% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Brake performance
(44% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(35% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
(34% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.0050% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0050% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0050% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0050% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
(34% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0050% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.0050% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.0050% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(75% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake performance
(74% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
(74% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.0050% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0050% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.0050% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0050% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
(74% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(35% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(180% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system (54% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.095% fail on Hand lever
- 0.080% fail on Pedal
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake control
(57% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Lever (49% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.085% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.060% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0050% fail on Valves
-
0.040% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(59% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.0050% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0050% fail on Servos
-
0.0050% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.0050% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.0050% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.0050% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
4.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(57% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Drag link end
- 0.010% fail on Steering arm
-
0.0050% fail on
Other components
- 0.0050% fail on Steering component
-
0.13% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
- 0.010% fail on Operation
-
0.045% fail on
Steering play
- 0.045% fail on Steering rack
-
0.010% fail on
Power steering
(85% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.0050% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.0050% fail on Other components
- 0.0050% fail on Steering column
- 0.0050% fail on Electronic power steering
-
8.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Visibility
(62% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Washers (23% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
View to rear
- 0.15% fail on Mirrors
-
0.070% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.070% fail on Windscreen
- 0.040% fail on Bonnet (60% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Driver's view
-
6.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(42% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(36% better than other 2011 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (48% better than other 2011 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (30% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
(45% better than other 2011 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Headlamp levelling device (78% better than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (25% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.18% fail on Battery(ies) (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Horn (88% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.16% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(65% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(64% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(64% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Direction indicators
(94% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Flashing type
(94% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Individual direction indicators (98% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Flashing type
(94% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Reversing lamps
(70% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Reversing lamps (69% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Position lamps
(61% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Position lamp
-
0.010% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.010% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.0050% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.0050% fail on Rear reflectors
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(36% better than other 2011 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
(12% better than other 2011 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Tread depth (11% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Size/type (53% better than other 2011 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(17% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Transmission
(40% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Drive shafts
(39% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Joints (39% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.0050% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.0050% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.015% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.015% fail on Joints
- 0.0050% fail on Belts
-
0.75% fail on
Drive shafts
(39% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.095% fail on
Doors
-
0.065% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.065% fail on Door condition
- 0.0050% fail on Catch
-
0.020% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.020% fail on Door condition
-
0.010% fail on
Other passenger's door
(82% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Door condition (82% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.065% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.055% fail on
Body
- 0.040% fail on Other body component
- 0.015% fail on Panel
-
0.050% fail on
Fuel system
(70% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Tank
- 0.020% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (81% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.0050% fail on System
- 0.045% fail on Bumpers
-
0.015% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.015% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.010% fail on
Seats
(82% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.010% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.010% fail on Other boot lid component
- 0.010% fail on Undertray
-
0.0050% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.0050% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.0050% fail on
Chassis
- 0.0050% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.0050% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0050% fail on Other towbar components
-
3.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(35% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(37% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(51% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (83% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.57% fail on Emissions not tested (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.010% fail on Other emission control equipment (11 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.0050% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.0050% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.020% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.95% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.16% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (42% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.020% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.0050% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0050% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.0050% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(51% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.14% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.015% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.010% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.0050% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0050% fail on Undertray
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(37% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(87% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Requirements
- 0.010% fail on Attachment
- 0.0050% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Road Wheels
(63% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Attachment (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.0050% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.39% fail on Registration plates
-
0.015% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.010% fail on Belt(s)/padding
- 0.0050% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
Nissan Juke (2010 - 2019)
Loads of choice when buying used thanks to its popularity, bold styling, decent value for money.