Nissan Juke MOT Results

Registered in 2010
73.3% pass rate
from 4,322 tests in 2017
(8.4% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.023% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.0% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Condition
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Location
    • 0.46% fail on Anti-roll bars (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.14% fail on Drive shafts (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Front drive shafts (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Constant velocity joints (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.046% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.046% fail on Condition
    • 0.046% fail on Wheel bearings (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Front
    • 0.046% fail on Shock absorbers (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Condition (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.023% fail on Condition
    • 0.023% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.023% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 6.8% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.069% fail on Rear lamps (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Headlamps (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Stop lamp (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Battery
    • 0.069% fail on Direction indicators (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Flashing type (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Side repeaters (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.046% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.046% fail on Horn
    • 0.023% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes (19% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.023% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.023% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Components (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.069% fail on Leaks
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear wheels (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.67% fail on Electronic stability system (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.069% fail on ABS
    • 0.069% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.023% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.023% fail on Pedal
        • 0.023% fail on Condition
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.046% fail on Size/type
  • 2.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Emissions (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.046% fail on System
      • 0.023% fail on Pipe
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering system (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.023% fail on Free play
        • 0.023% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.19% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.023% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.37% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.21% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.069% fail on Doors
      • 0.046% fail on Drivers
      • 0.023% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.023% fail on Seats
      • 0.023% fail on Passengers
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages