Nissan Juke MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.2% pass rate
from 5,091 tests in 2020
(11% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint dust cover (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.7% fail on Springs (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Coil springs (30% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Coil spring (30% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on Mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Linkage ball joints (39% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage
      • 0.020% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.88% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.079% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.098% fail on Wheel bearings (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Shock absorbers (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.098% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.039% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.020% fail on Axles
      • 0.020% fail on Axle
    • 0.020% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.020% fail on Sub-frame
  • 9.5% fail on Brakes (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Brake pads (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.86% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.86% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (31% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (31% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.94% fail on Service brake performance (31% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.098% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.24% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.079% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Rbt (87% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.039% fail on Parking brake performance (92% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.039% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.81% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.020% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.14% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.14% fail on Lever
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.079% fail on Pedal
      • 0.039% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.059% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.059% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.020% fail on Brake fluid
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.079% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.079% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.079% fail on View to rear
      • 0.079% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.12% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.098% fail on Horn
      • 0.039% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.098% fail on Direction indicators (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Flashing type (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.039% fail on Reversing lamps (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Reversing lamps (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 6.2% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.020% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.098% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.098% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.020% fail on Power steering
      • 0.020% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.020% fail on Steering play
      • 0.020% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Transmission
      • 0.90% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.90% fail on Joints
      • 0.059% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.059% fail on Joints
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.059% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.059% fail on Door condition
      • 0.039% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.039% fail on Door condition
      • 0.020% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition
    • 0.039% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.039% fail on Body
      • 0.039% fail on Other body component
    • 0.020% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.020% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.020% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Bracket
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.71% fail on Compression ignition (41% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.059% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.020% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.020% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.020% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Requirements
    • 0.098% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.67% fail on Road Wheels (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Hubs
  • 0.45% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.039% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.020% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.020% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages