MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Juke » 2010

Nissan Juke MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.3% pass rate
from 4,958 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Juke is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.5% fail on Springs (18% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Coil springs (18% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Coil spring (18% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Mounting
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (20% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage
      • 0.020% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.061% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.040% fail on Shock absorbers (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint
  • 10% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.040% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.020% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.30% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.061% fail on Power steering
      • 0.020% fail on Operation
      • 0.020% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.020% fail on Other components
    • 0.061% fail on Steering play
      • 0.061% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.020% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 9.7% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Brake pads (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.95% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.95% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (42% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (45% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.81% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake imbalance (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (76% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 0.081% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.020% fail on Pedal
    • 0.081% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.061% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.081% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.061% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.040% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.18% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.020% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.040% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.020% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.020% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.040% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.020% fail on Horn
    • 0.12% fail on Direction indicators (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Flashing type (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.10% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.081% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Reversing lamps (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Reversing lamps (85% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Size/type
  • 4.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
        • 0.040% fail on Flexible couplings (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.081% fail on Joints
      • 0.020% fail on Belts
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
      • 0.081% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.081% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Tank (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.020% fail on System
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.061% fail on Panel
      • 0.040% fail on Other body component
      • 0.020% fail on Body condition
    • 0.020% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.020% fail on Seats
      • 0.020% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.020% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.020% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.020% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.83% fail on Compression ignition (34% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.020% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.020% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.020% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.020% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.20% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.020% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.020% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Requirements
    • 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.83% fail on Road Wheels (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages