Nissan Figaro MOT Results
Registered in 200858.4% pass rate
from 250 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Figaro is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(47% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Horn
- 0.80% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.80% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(31 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (44 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.40% fail on Position lamp
-
10% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(14 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Transmission
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.0% fail on Joints
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
-
1.2% fail on
Front passenger's door
(8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Door condition (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Front passenger's door
(8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Chassis
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Bumpers
-
0.40% fail on
Body
- 0.40% fail on Other body component
- 0.40% fail on Floor
-
0.40% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.40% fail on Boot lid condition
-
11% fail on
Suspension
- 8.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.40% fail on
Springs
-
0.40% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.40% fail on Coil spring
-
0.40% fail on
Coil springs
-
10% fail on
Visibility
(66% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
- 0.40% fail on Bonnet
-
0.40% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.40% fail on Windscreen
-
8.4% fail on
Brakes
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.40% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
-
4.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.80% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.40% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.40% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.40% fail on Pedal
-
0.40% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.40% fail on Lever
-
0.40% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.40% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.40% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.40% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.40% fail on Brake pads
-
0.40% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Non catalyst emissions (43 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.40% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.40% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
6.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
-
1.6% fail on
Power steering
(7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Pipes and hoses (19 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Tyres
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
0.40% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.40% fail on Attachment