MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Figaro » 2005

Nissan Figaro MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.6% pass rate
from 343 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Figaro is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission
      • 4.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.1% fail on Joints
      • 0.29% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.29% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.87% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.87% fail on Engine mounting (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Engine mounting condition (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Cabs (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Floor
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.29% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.29% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.29% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.87% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.87% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.2% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (37 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.58% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.29% fail on Pedal
      • 0.29% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.29% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.29% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.29% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.29% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.29% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.29% fail on Brake pads
  • 11% fail on Suspension (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.87% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 8.2% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
  • 7.6% fail on Steering (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Other components
        • 0.29% fail on Steering component
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other components (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Operation
      • 0.29% fail on Rams
  • 6.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions (34 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.58% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 0.58% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages