Nissan Figaro MOT Results
Registered in 200262.5% pass rate
from 72 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Figaro is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Suspension
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint
-
2.8% fail on
Springs
-
1.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.4% fail on Coil spring
- 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp
-
1.4% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 1.4% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
6.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.9% fail on
Transmission
-
6.9% fail on
Drive shafts
- 6.9% fail on Joints
-
6.9% fail on
Drive shafts
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 1.4% fail on Bumpers
-
1.4% fail on
Engine mounting
- 1.4% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
-
1.4% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 1.4% fail on Door condition
-
1.4% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
6.9% fail on
Transmission
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.9% fail on
Rbt
- 6.9% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
6.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.4% fail on Brake fluid
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
- 8.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions (37 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.3% fail on
Visibility
- 8.3% fail on Washers
-
6.9% fail on
Steering
-
5.6% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
-
5.6% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.4% fail on
Tyres
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth