Nissan Figaro MOT Results

Registered in 1992
56.0% pass rate
from 191 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Figaro is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.52% fail on Lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.3% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.7% fail on Components
        • 3.7% fail on Pipes
      • 1.0% fail on Leaks
      • 0.52% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Hub components
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.52% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.52% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.3% fail on Component mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.52% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.52% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
  • 9.9% fail on Steering (94% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Steering system
      • 4.7% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.7% fail on Power steering (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Other components (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Operation
      • 0.52% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.8% fail on Washers
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
  • 6.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis
    • 2.6% fail on Body condition
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 1.0% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.52% fail on Engine mountings
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (67% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
  • 0.52% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages